Related Experiment Videos

Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from unrelated and sibling donors: single center

T Lamparelli1, M T Van Lint, F Gualandi

  • 1Divisione Ematologia II, Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy.

Bone Marrow Transplantation
|February 18, 1998
PubMed

Insights

Allogeneic bone marrow transplants for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using matched unrelated donors (MUD) show similar survival to sibling donors (SIB). MUD recipients experienced more graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but had lower relapse rates, suggesting comparable long-term outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Transplantation Immunology

Background:

  • Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a curative option for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
  • Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse are major complications following BMT.
  • The choice of donor, either HLA-identical sibling (SIB) or matched unrelated donor (MUD), impacts outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of allogeneic BMT in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving grafts from HLA-identical sibling (SIB) donors versus matched unrelated donors (MUD).
  • To evaluate differences in engraftment, GVHD, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, transplant-related mortality, relapse, and survival between SIB and MUD BMT.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 60 consecutive CML patients undergoing allogeneic BMT was analyzed.
  • Patients received unmanipulated bone marrow grafts after conditioning with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation.
  • GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporin A and methotrexate; CMV prophylaxis varied by donor type.

Main Results:

  • MUD recipients were younger, had younger donors, longer pre-transplant intervals, and received fewer nucleated cells compared to SIB recipients.
  • Engraftment kinetics were similar, but SIB recipients had better early platelet recovery.
  • MUD recipients experienced significantly higher rates of acute GVHD (33% vs 6% severe), while chronic GVHD and CMV antigenemia were comparable.
  • Three-year survival was similar (78% SIB vs 82% MUD), with comparable transplant-related mortality (12% SIB vs 17% MUD) and relapse rates (18% SIB vs 6% MUD).

Conclusions:

  • Allogeneic BMT from well-matched MUDs offers survival outcomes comparable to SIB donors for CML patients.
  • The increased incidence of acute GVHD in MUD recipients may be offset by a reduced risk of leukemia relapse.
  • Careful donor selection and management of GVHD are crucial for successful MUD BMT in CML.

Related Concept Videos