Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgery under siege: A case study of leg amputation in 18th century Louisbourg, Nova Scotia, Canada.

International journal of paleopathology·2024
Same author

The ice age with little effect? Exploring stress in the Danish Black Friars cemetery before and after the turn of the 14th century.

International journal of paleopathology·2019
Same author

The biochemical signatures of stress: A preliminary analysis of osteocalcin concentrations and macroscopic skeletal changes associated with stress in the 13th - 17th centuries black friars population.

American journal of physical anthropology·2015
Same author

Lateral rectus muscle disinsertion and reattachment to the lateral orbital wall.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2005
Same author

Progressive restrictive strabismus acquired in infancy.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2005
Same author

An interpersonal analysis of Rorschach aggression variables in a normal sample.

Psychological reports·2002

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Instructed faking and MMPI-2 response latencies: the potential for assessing response validity

D G Brunetti1, R S Schlottmann, A B Scott

  • 1Oklahoma State University, USA.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|February 19, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Response time differences in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) can indicate deceptive answering. Analyzing these MMPI-2 latencies may help detect invalid response styles in psychological assessments.

More Related Videos

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Assessing response validity is crucial in psychological testing to ensure accurate interpretations.
  • Response latencies, the time taken to answer questions, have been proposed as a potential indicator of response styles.
  • Previous research has explored various factors influencing response times in personality inventories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) response latencies between honest and faking groups.
  • To determine if response latencies vary based on instructions to underreport or overreport psychopathology.
  • To explore the relationship between response latencies, response styles, and response validity.

Main Methods:

  • 120 undergraduate students completed a computer-administered MMPI-2.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: honest responding, underreporting psychopathology, or overreporting psychopathology.
  • Response latencies for each item were recorded and analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Subjects took significantly longer to respond when their response pattern was inconsistent with their assigned response set.
  • Conversely, subjects took less time when their response pattern was consistent with their response set.
  • Differential response latencies were observed across the honest, underreporting, and overreporting groups.

Conclusions:

  • Response latencies are related to response styles and validity.
  • The findings suggest that MMPI-2 response latencies can differentiate between honest responding and faking.
  • Future research could develop methodologies using response latencies to assess the validity of psychological assessments.