Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lower limb amputation. 4: Some ethical considerations

S J Donohue1

  • 1Vascular Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals Trust.

British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
|February 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Some patients may refuse amputation, preferring death over surgery due to chronic pain and disability. Healthcare professionals must respect patient autonomy, even when the alternative is fatal.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential analysis of serum and urine S100 proteins in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE).

Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)·2020
Same author

Evolution of melatonin as a night signal: Contribution from a primitive photosynthetic organism.

Molecular and cellular neurosciences·2009
Same author

Vaccination with a recombinant vaccinia vaccine containing the B7-1 co-stimulatory molecule causes no significant toxicity and enhances T cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

International journal of cancer·2000
Same author

Toxicity of dolastatin 10 in mice, rats and dogs and its clinical relevance.

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology·1999
Same author

Lower limb amputation. 3: The role of the nurse.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·1998
Same author

Lower limb amputation 2: once the decision to amputate has been made.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·1997

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Surgical Decision-Making
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Amputation offers relief from chronic pain, infection, and disability for some.
  • Others may consider death a preferable alternative to amputation.
  • Denying amputation when the prognosis is death sparks ethical debate among stakeholders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the complex issues surrounding a patient's decision to refuse amputation.
  • To highlight the ethical considerations when patients decline life-altering surgical procedures.
  • To emphasize the importance of respecting patient autonomy in end-of-life care decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of ethical frameworks in medical decision-making.
  • Case study analysis of patients refusing amputation.
  • Discussion of healthcare professional, family, and carer perspectives.

Main Results:

  • Patient refusal of amputation is often driven by a desire to avoid further suffering or maintain bodily integrity.
  • Ethical dilemmas arise when patient wishes conflict with perceived medical best interests.
  • Respecting patient autonomy is paramount, even when the alternative prognosis is grave.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare professionals must engage in open communication and shared decision-making with patients considering amputation.
  • Understanding the patient's values and reasons for refusal is crucial for ethical care.
  • The final decision regarding amputation, when the alternative is death, ultimately rests with the individual.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos