Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Reduced incidence of ventricular ectopy with a 4F Halo catheter during pediatric cardiac catheterization
1Department of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children at the New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA. robert.geggel@es.nemc.org
Insights
The 4F Halo catheter significantly reduces ventricular ectopy during pediatric left ventriculography compared to the 4F pigtail catheter. This finding suggests the Halo catheter is a safer choice for pediatric cardiac assessments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Catheter-induced ventricular ectopy can impede accurate assessment of cardiac contractility and anatomy.
- Left ventriculography is a crucial diagnostic procedure in pediatric cardiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of catheter-induced ventricular ectopy between 4F Halo and 4F pigtail catheters during pediatric left ventriculography.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different catheter types in minimizing arrhythmias during cardiac procedures.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 34 pediatric patients undergoing left ventriculography.
- Patients were randomized to receive either a 4F Halo or a 4F pigtail catheter.
- Ventricular ectopy, including couplets and tachycardia, was monitored and compared between the two groups.
Main Results:
- The 4F Halo catheter group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of overall ventricular ectopy (3 vs. 13 studies, P < 0.001).
- Fewer instances of ventricular ectopy exceeding one beat (1 vs. 10 studies, P < 0.002) and ventricular couplets or tachycardia (1 vs. 9 studies, P < 0.008) were observed with the Halo catheter.
- No significant differences were noted in patient demographics, hemodynamic parameters, or contrast volume between the groups.
Conclusions:
- The 4F Halo catheter is associated with a substantially reduced risk of ventricular ectopy compared to the 4F pigtail catheter in pediatric left ventriculography.
- The Halo catheter should be considered for routine use in pediatric cardiac catheterization to minimize procedure-related arrhythmias.
- Utilizing the Halo catheter may improve the quality and safety of diagnostic cardiac imaging in infants and children.
Abstract:
Catheter-induced ventricular ectopy can limit assessment of contractility or anatomy. We compared the incidence of ventricular ectopy in infants and children undergoing left ventriculography using a 4F Halo catheter or a 4F pigtail catheter. For each group, 17 patients had 19 ventriculograms. Iopamidol 76% was used for each study. There was no statistical difference between the Halo and pigtail groups (mean+/-SEM) for age (16.2+/-3.8 vs. 12.9+/-1.8 mo), weight(8.1+/-1.0 vs. 8.0+/-0.7 kg), gender, left ventricular end diastolic pressure (9.6+/-1.1 vs. 9.8+/-1.3 mm Hg), catheter location in the ventricle, or volume of contrast (1.31+/-0.06 vs. 1.35+/-0.06 cc/kg). The Halo group had a more rapid injection rate (1.42+/-0.15 vs. 0.99+/-0.10 cc/kg/sec, P< 0.02). The Halo group had a lower overall incidence of ventricular ectopy (3 vs. 13 studies, P < 0.001), ventricular ectopy >1 beat (1 vs. 10 studies, P < 0.002), and ventricular couplets or tachycardia (1 vs. 9 studies, P < 0.008). The 4F Halo catheter is associated with less ventricular ectopy than a 4F pigtail catheter and should be considered for use during pediatric catheterization.
More Related Videos
08:00Reduction of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defects with an Anterior and Inferior Transseptal Puncture Site when Operating the Cryoballoon Ablation Catheter
Published on: June 15, 2015
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization