Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effective hydrocele ablation

J A Fracchia1, N A Armenakas, A D Kohan

  • 1Division of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|February 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Traumatic avulsion of the dorsal penile artery mimicking a penile fracture.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Relationship of prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in patients with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The Prostate·2000
Same author

Effect of aging on bladder function and the response to outlet obstruction in female rats.

Urological research·2000
Same author

The perioperative charge equivalence of interstitial brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy with 1-year followup.

The Journal of urology·2000
Same author

Bladder cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1 and TIS). The American Urological Association.

The Journal of urology·1999
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Aspiration and sclerotherapy offer a safe, cost-effective alternative to surgery for select hydrocele (fluid in the scrotum) cases. This minimally invasive procedure demonstrates good efficacy, making it a viable treatment option.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Surgical repair of hydroceles can be costly and involve significant recovery time.
  • Alternative treatments are sought to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare expenses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of aspiration and sclerotherapy for treating hydroceles.
  • To compare this method against traditional surgical interventions.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 51 hydroceles in 47 patients were treated using office-based aspiration and instillation of a sodium tetradecyl sulfate-based sclerosing agent.
  • Medicare data from 1995 were analyzed for cost comparisons between surgical repair and the aspiration-sclerotherapy technique.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The overall success rate for aspiration and sclerotherapy was 61%, defined by the absence of fluid reaccumulation and patient satisfaction.
  • A 39% failure rate was observed, attributed to fluid reaccumulation and/or patient dissatisfaction.
  • The cost differential between surgery and aspiration-sclerotherapy exceeded a 9:1 ratio, favoring the latter.

Conclusions:

  • Aspiration and sclerotherapy is an effective, safe, and cost-efficient treatment for select patients with idiopathic hydroceles.
  • This technique presents a valuable alternative to surgical intervention, particularly concerning economic factors and patient recovery.