Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence with confidence intervals

R Thomas1, A Braganza, L M Oommen

  • 1Schell Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The burden of COVID-19 infection in a rural Tamil Nadu community.

BMC infectious diseases·2021
Same author

Prevalence and Visual Outcomes of Cataract Surgery in Rural South India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2016
Same author

Rotavirus and other Diarrheal Disease in a Birth Cohort from Southern Indian Community.

Indian pediatrics·2016
Same author

Changes in knowledge and practices related to taeniasis/cysticercosis after health education in a south Indian community.

International health·2013
Same author

Prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Vellore, South India.

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene·2013
Same author

Risk factors for acquiring Strongyloides stercoralis infection among patients attending a tertiary hospital in south India.

Indian journal of medical microbiology·2011

Practicing ophthalmologists need to understand the magnitude of treatment differences, not just statistical significance. Confidence intervals offer a more complete evaluation of study results than traditional p-values for clinical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Clinical studies often report treatment differences using p-values, which indicate statistical significance.
  • Traditional reliance on p-values (e.g., <0.05) can limit the understanding of the clinical implications of treatment effects.
  • Practicing ophthalmologists require information on the magnitude of differences to guide patient care decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate the utility of confidence intervals in evaluating the precision and clinical applicability of study results.
  • To demonstrate how confidence intervals provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment effects compared to p-values.
  • To guide ophthalmologists in interpreting study findings for better clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The article uses simple examples to explain confidence intervals.
  • It demonstrates the application of confidence intervals for comparing means and proportions.
  • The focus is on evaluating the precision and clinical relevance of observed differences between treatment groups.

Main Results:

  • Confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values for the true treatment effect.
  • This range allows for a more nuanced understanding of the magnitude and clinical significance of observed differences.
  • Confidence intervals offer a more complete evaluation of study results than p-values alone.

Conclusions:

  • Confidence intervals enhance the interpretation of clinical study results by quantifying uncertainty.
  • Their use enables a more thorough assessment of treatment efficacy and clinical applicability.
  • Adopting confidence intervals can lead to more informed clinical decisions in ophthalmology.