Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Common problems in using, modifying, and reporting on classic measurement instruments

L H Daltroy1

  • 1Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Rheumatology/Immunology, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Arthritis Care and Research : the Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association
|March 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spouse intention to encourage cardiac patient participation in exercise.

American journal of health promotion : AJHP·2011
Same author

Validation of a Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) for population studies.

Lupus·2003
Same author

Variable effects of social support by race, economic status, and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

The Journal of rheumatology·2001
Same author

American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children burn outcomes questionnaire: construction and psychometric properties.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2000
Same author

Rheumatologist-patient communication about exercise and physical therapy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association·1999
Same author

Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: the influence of response shift and other factors.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1999

Understanding classic summated scales involves key principles for reliability. Proper scale construction and item selection are crucial for accurate measurement and meaningful interpretation of results.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Scale Development
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Classic summated scales rely on assumptions of unidimensionality and item sampling.
  • Scale reliability is influenced by item count and inter-item correlations.
  • Higher reliability standards are necessary for treatment-related decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify common issues in the development and use of classic summated scales.
  • To provide guidance on optimizing scale reliability and score interpretation.
  • To discuss the psychometric appropriateness of coefficient alpha and item selection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of psychometric principles for scale construction.
  • Discussion of methods to improve scale reliability (e.g., item addition, response set expansion).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of item omission impact and comparison of generic vs. disease-specific scales.

    • Main Results:

    • Scale reliability increases with more items and higher item correlations.
    • Coefficient alpha may be misleading for limited domains.
    • Standard item selection can bias change estimation at scale ends.
    • Generic scales can be as effective as disease-specific scales.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to fundamental principles of scale development is essential for valid and reliable measurement.
    • Modifications to scales require empirical validation.
    • Understanding scale properties aids in accurate interpretation and application of scores.
    • Generic scales offer advantages in cross-group comparisons.