Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effectiveness analysis in surgery

S R Finlayson1, J D Birkmeyer

  • 1Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

Surgery
|March 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes.

The British journal of surgery·2012
Same author

Case mix, quality and high-cost kidney transplant patients.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2009
Same author

The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2008
Same author

Decision analysis for small, asymptomatic intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Neurosurgical focus·2006
Same author

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

Surgical endoscopy·2003
Same journal

Outcomes following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarian patients.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistulas: Should we be concerned about incontinence?

Surgery·2026
Same journal

No need for mesh in the repair of hiatal hernias: Autologous tissue hiatoplasty techniques for the repair of the complex diaphragmatic defect.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Incretin-based therapies and altered myocardial metabolism in a swine model of ischemic heart disease in the setting of metabolic syndrome.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Colonoscopy utilization and persistent disparities in early onset colorectal cancer: A multistate, multi-institution nested case-control study.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

From blades to heels: Lessons in performance from the ice to the practice of surgery.

Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) systematically assesses health care interventions. Surgeons must understand CEA to critically evaluate its role in surgical policy decisions and resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Clinical Policy Analysis

Background:

  • Increasing pressure on healthcare budgets necessitates identifying cost-effective clinical interventions.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is increasingly utilized to evaluate the value of surgical procedures.
  • Understanding CEA is crucial for navigating healthcare spending constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the principles and applications of cost-effectiveness analysis in surgery.
  • To demonstrate CEA methodology using a carotid endarterectomy case study.
  • To highlight challenges and limitations in applying CEA to clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of general concepts and techniques of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of CEA in resource allocation using the Oregon Medicaid experiment.
  • Analysis of CEA's role in evaluating new, controversial, or competing surgical interventions.

    • Main Results:

    • CEA provides a framework for comparing the value of different health interventions.
    • The Oregon Medicaid experiment illustrates potential difficulties in applying CEA to resource allocation.
    • CEA is most relevant for informing decisions on novel, debated, or alternative surgical treatments.

    Conclusions:

    • Cost-effectiveness analysis is a systematic method for evaluating healthcare intervention value.
    • CEA is becoming integral to surgical policy formulation.
    • Surgeons require a critical understanding of CEA studies to inform practice and policy.