Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tests in psychiatry

J Ellard

    The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
    |March 4, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Psychiatrists should critically evaluate ancillary tests, as many lack clinical validity and focus on labeling rather than patient management. Simple questions often prove more effective for diagnosis and treatment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Experience and psychological impact of anal cancer screening in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.

    Psycho-oncology·2017
    Same author

    Seroconversion in context.

    AIDS care·2003
    Same author

    Response to 'traumatic stress in the 21st century'.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2001
    Same author

    Urothelial differentiation and bladder cancer.

    Advances in experimental medicine and biology·1999
    Same author

    On psychiatry: some reflections circa 1998.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·1999
    Same author

    Duty of care.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·1998
    Same journal

    Letter to the Editor regarding 'Middle childhood profiles of social-emotional competencies and difficulties differentiate risk of health service presentations with adolescent mental disorders'.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic complexity and comorbidity: Implications for identification, outcomes, health care and involuntary treatment.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Defining and measuring psychosocial disability in Australia: Assessment of national surveys and administrative datasets.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Academic performance in children of mothers with perinatal depressive disorder.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    The Multisensory Hallucinations Schedule to assess hallucinations across multiple sensory modalities in psychosis: A pilot validation study.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Student wellbeing supports in Australian and New Zealand medical schools: A post-guidance snapshot from a 14-institution survey.

    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychometric Assessment

    Background:

    • Clinical psychiatrists have access to various ancillary tests for patient assessment.
    • The utility and validity of these tests in routine psychiatric practice are frequently debated.
    • Current practices may involve test usage without full comprehension of their limitations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine the proposition that psychiatrists should increase their use of available ancillary tests.
    • To evaluate the clinical usefulness and validity of commonly employed psychiatric assessment tools.
    • To explore the impact of these tests on diagnostic accuracy and patient categorization.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of literature and common practices regarding the use of ancillary psychiatric tests.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the scoring procedures, norms, and limitations of selected mental status tests and questionnaires.
  • Comparison of the effectiveness of standardized tests versus simple direct questioning in psychiatric assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Many ancillary tests possess doubtful validity and are not clinically useful.
    • Tests often prioritize reliability over validity, leading to categorization that is impermanent and insubstantial.
    • Commonly used measures have been shown to be misleading and do not improve diagnostic accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Ancillary tests offer limited assistance in clinical management and diagnosis for psychiatrists.
    • The primary function of many tests appears to be patient labeling rather than illuminating the nature of disorders.
    • Direct clinical questioning is often a more valid and useful approach for psychiatric assessment.