Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating sample size for continuous outcomes, comparing more than two parallel groups with unequal sizes

J Singer1

  • 1Chinoin Pharmaceutical and Chemical Works Ltd., Clinical Research Unit, Budapest, Hungary.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 4, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Is More Strongly Associated with Exercise Duration than with Volume, Frequency, or Consistency.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2025
Same author

OUTPACE: Outcomes of urinary incontinence treatment in primary care - APP co-management and electronic consult.

Contemporary clinical trials·2025
Same author

Systemic anticancer therapy near the end of life: an analysis of factors influencing treatment in advanced tumor disease.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy in COVID-19 Versus Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2021
Same author

The impact of pre-eclampsia definitions on the identification of adverse outcome risk in hypertensive pregnancy - analyses from the CHIPS trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study).

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same author

Measuring vaccine effectiveness against persistent HPV infections: a comparison of different statistical approaches.

BMC infectious diseases·2020
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study generalizes sample size determination for more than two parallel groups. Optimal designs may not use equal group sizes, contrary to common assumptions.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Experimental Design

Background:

  • Sample size determination is crucial for study power.
  • Existing methods primarily focus on two-group comparisons.
  • Generalizing these methods to multiple groups is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generalize sample size determination methods for more than two parallel groups.
  • To define and utilize 'set of allocation ratios' for multi-group designs.
  • To investigate the optimality of equal group sizes in multi-group studies.

Main Methods:

  • Definition of 'set of allocation ratios' for multi-group sample size calculations.
  • Deduction of a formula for the non-centrality parameter of the F distribution using allocation ratios.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the generalized method with worked examples.

    • Main Results:

    • A method for sample size determination in studies with more than two parallel groups is presented.
    • The non-centrality parameter calculation is adapted for multi-group designs.
    • It is demonstrated that equal group sizes are not always optimal for multi-group studies.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed generalization provides a flexible approach to sample size determination for multiple parallel groups.
    • Researchers should consider unequal group allocations for potentially more powerful study designs.
    • The findings offer practical guidance for designing multi-arm clinical trials and experiments.