Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task

S A Hackley1, F Valle-Inclán

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA. shackley@showme.missouri.edu

Nature
|March 5, 1998
PubMed
Summary

An irrelevant accessory stimulus speeds up reaction time by enhancing early perceptual processing, not late motor execution. This finding challenges theories suggesting the effect is purely motoric.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cross-modal warning effects on reflexive and voluntary reactions.

Psychophysiology·2002
Same author

Psychophysiological studies of unattended information processing.

The Spanish journal of psychology·2002
Same author

Electrical activity in primary visual area due to interocular suppression.

Neuroreport·2001
Same author

Prevalence of pregnancy and postpartum thyroid dysfunction in a homogeneous population of Spain.

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology·1999
Same author

Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: does arousal speed decision making?

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·1999
Same author

Serum leptin levels in women throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period and in women suffering spontaneous abortion.

Clinical endocrinology·1999

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Choice reaction time tasks reveal response facilitation when an irrelevant stimulus accompanies the imperative signal.
  • This 'automatic alerting' effect is theorized to stem from a surge in arousal.
  • Debate exists whether facilitation impacts early perceptual or late motoric processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between early perceptual and late motoric explanations for reaction time facilitation.
  • To investigate the temporal locus of the accessory stimulus effect.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a choice reaction time task with an irrelevant acoustic stimulus.
  • Employed the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) as a neural marker to segment reaction time.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the impact of the accessory stimulus on pre-motor and motoric intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • The irrelevant acoustic stimulus significantly shortened the pre-motor interval (perceptual and decision-making stages).
    • The accessory stimulus had no significant effect on the motoric interval.
    • This pattern supports an early-stage facilitation mechanism.

    Conclusions:

    • The observed reaction time facilitation is attributable to an enhancement of early perceptual and decision-making processes.
    • The motoric hypothesis, suggesting facilitation at a late motor execution stage, is rejected.
    • Findings contribute to understanding attentional mechanisms and cognitive load in reaction time tasks.