Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Quality assurance by interviews with patients]

H Spiessl1, C Cording, H E Klein

  • 1Bezirksklinikum Regensburg.

Zeitschrift Fur Arztliche Fortbildung Und Qualitatssicherung
|March 6, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Patient satisfaction is crucial for evaluating psychiatric care quality. However, methodological issues in current research hinder accurate measurement, necessitating the development of better tools for quality assurance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Implementation of the recommendations for psychotherapy after psychiatric inpatient treatment : Results of the PAKT study Part II].

Der Nervenarzt·2016
Same author

[Recommendations for psychotherapy in psychiatric inpatient treatment : Results of the PAKT Study Part I].

Der Nervenarzt·2016
Same author

Needs-oriented discharge planning for high utilisers of psychiatric services: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2011
Same author

[The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance].

Der Nervenarzt·2009
Same author

[The public health service in the community psychiatry association].

Psychiatrische Praxis·2009
Same author

[Documentation in psychiatry and psychotherapy: prerequisites and clinical practice].

Der Nervenarzt·2008

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatric care evaluation
  • Quality assurance in healthcare
  • Patient-reported outcomes

Context:

  • Growing interest in subjective criteria like patient satisfaction in psychiatric care.
  • Existing research on patient satisfaction has methodological limitations.
  • Need for robust instruments to measure patient satisfaction accurately.

Purpose:

  • To highlight the importance of patient satisfaction in psychiatric care assessment.
  • To identify methodological challenges in current patient satisfaction research.
  • To advocate for the development of reliable and valid measurement tools.

Summary:

  • Presents findings from own studies on patient satisfaction in psychiatric care.
  • Discusses limitations in current patient satisfaction research methodologies.
  • Emphasizes the need for improved instruments for quality assurance.

Impact:

  • Informs future research directions for patient satisfaction measurement.
  • Contributes to the development of better quality assurance strategies in mental health.
  • Aims to enhance the reliability and validity of patient satisfaction assessments.

Related Experiment Videos