Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Animal experiments for testing a hydroxyapatite ceramic coating under vacuum conditions]

R Kettner1, S Jänicke, H J Schmitz

  • 1Klinik für Zahn-, Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen.

Mund-, Kiefer- Und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG
|March 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary

This study compared two ways of coating orthopedic implants with hydroxyapatite ceramic. One method used vacuum plasma spraying (VPS), and the other used atmospheric plasma spraying (APS). The implants were placed in rabbit femurs and tested after 84 and 365 days. The VPS method produced coatings with higher tensile strength and better load capacity. However, both coatings had similar bone integration. The findings suggest that vacuum plasma spraying could improve implant durability without affecting how well the implant integrates with bone.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Environmental determinants on the assemblage structure of Drosophilidae flies in a temperate-subtropical region.

Neotropical entomology·2015
Same author

A Neural Network Model of Cortical Activity during Reaching.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Population dynamics of drosophilids in the pampa biome in response to temperature.

Neotropical entomology·2013
Same author

Drosophilid assemblages at different urbanization levels in the city of Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil.

Neotropical entomology·2013
Same author

CYP1A1-inducing potency in H4IIE cells and chemical composition of technical mixtures of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011
Same author

2,3,7,8-Tetrafluorodibenzo-p-dioxin: a potent agonist of the murine dioxin receptor.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic implant development
  • Biomaterials engineering
  • Tissue integration studies

Background:

Orthopedic implants often face challenges with coating durability. Standard plasma spraying under atmospheric conditions can lead to coating defects. Delamination is a common issue with hydroxyapatite coatings. This limits the long-term success of implants in bone integration. Researchers have explored alternative coating methods to improve performance. Vacuum plasma spraying is one such technique. It may offer better mechanical properties than conventional methods. This paper investigates how vacuum plasma spraying affects coating stability.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to compare two hydroxyapatite coating methods. One used vacuum plasma spraying (VPS), the other atmospheric plasma spraying (APS). The study aimed to assess coating performance in a rabbit model. Researchers wanted to evaluate both tensile strength and bone integration. They focused on implants placed in distal femurs. The model allowed observation of outcomes at 84 and 365 days. The study sought to determine if VPS improves coating durability. It also aimed to measure how well each coating supports bone growth.

Keywords:
hydroxyapatite ceramicvacuum plasma sprayingbone implant coatingsorthopedic implant testing

Frequently Asked Questions

VPS coatings are applied under vacuum conditions, while APS coatings use atmospheric pressure. The vacuum method improves tensile strength and load capacity.

Histomorphologic evaluation was used to assess bony coverage after 84 and 365 days. More than 86% of surfaces had mature bone.

The porous titanium layer provides mechanical support and enhances osseointegration. It acts as a base for the hydroxyapatite coating.

These time points allowed researchers to assess both short- and long-term performance of the coatings. Both showed improved strength with VPS.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used a standardized rabbit model for implant testing. Cylindrical implants were 6 x 4 mm in size. A flattened region of 800 microns was prepared for coating. Two types of coatings were applied: APS-H-A.C. and VPS-H-A.C. Both had a 150-micron hydroxyapatite layer. An underlying 50-micron porous titanium layer was used in both. Implants were placed in distal femurs under the patella. Animals were sacrificed after either 84 or 365 days.

Main Results:

After 84 days, more than 86% of each coating surface had mature bone. The VPS-H-A.C. coating showed twice the tensile strength of APS-H-A.C. At 365 days, both coatings had over 94% bony coverage. The VPS-H-A.C. coating still had higher tensile strength values. These results suggest better mechanical performance with VPS. Bone integration was similar between the two coatings. The study found no significant difference in bone affinity. The vacuum method improved load capacity without reducing integration.

Conclusions:

The authors found that VPS-H-A.C. coatings have better tensile strength than APS-H-A.C. coatings. This was true at both 84 and 365 days post-implantation. The vacuum method improved load capacity without affecting bone integration. Both coatings supported similar levels of bony coverage. The study suggests that vacuum plasma spraying enhances coating durability. It does not, however, increase the affinity for bone growth. The findings support using VPS for more stable implants. The authors propose that this method could improve implant longevity.

No significant difference in bone affinity was found. Both coatings supported similar levels of bony coverage.

The study suggests that vacuum plasma spraying improves coating durability without reducing bone integration. This could lead to more stable orthopedic implants.