Related Experiment Videos
Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development
1Department of Psychology, Social and Health Sciences, Duke University, USA. vcmcloyd@umich.edu
The American Psychologist
|March 10, 1998
Summary
Persistent poverty significantly harms children's IQ, academic success, and socioemotional development more than temporary poverty. Children facing both types of poverty show the poorest outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- Socioeconomic Factors
- Psychology
Background:
- Persistent poverty poses greater risks to child development than transitory poverty.
- Children experiencing both persistent and transitory poverty exhibit poorer outcomes.
- Understanding the multifaceted impacts of poverty on child development is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the differential effects of persistent versus transitory poverty on children's cognitive, academic, and socioemotional functioning.
- To identify mediating factors contributing to developmental deficits in children from low-income backgrounds.
- To inform policy and practice interventions aimed at mitigating poverty's adverse effects.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent research findings on poverty and child development.
- Analysis of factors contributing to diminished cognitive functioning in impoverished children.
- Examination of mediators for lower school achievement and socioemotional difficulties.
Main Results:
- Persistent poverty has more detrimental effects on IQ, school achievement, and socioemotional functioning than transitory poverty.
- Factors like perinatal complications, reduced resources, lead exposure, and less cognitive stimulation impair cognitive function.
- Lower teacher expectations and readiness skills contribute to academic underachievement.
Conclusions:
- Socioeconomic disadvantage impacts children's development through various pathways, including cognitive, academic, and socioemotional domains.
- Harsh parenting and stressors mediate the link between disadvantage and socioemotional functioning.
- Findings have significant implications for policy and practice interventions to support vulnerable children.