Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Intussusception in children: reduction with repeated, delayed air enema
A Gorenstein1, A Raucher, F Serour
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Insights
Repeated, delayed pneumatic reduction for intussusception significantly improves success rates. This approach enhances outcomes by allowing multiple air enema trials, especially in longer-presenting cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Intussusception is a common surgical emergency in infants and children.
- Pneumatic reduction is a standard, non-operative treatment for intussusception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic reduction for intussusception.
- To determine the impact of repeated, delayed air enema trials on treatment success.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-one patients with intussusception underwent pneumatic reduction using air enemas.
- Treatment protocols were compared: single trial (pre-1993) vs. up to three trials (post-1993).
- Patients were stratified by symptom duration: <12 hours, 12-24 hours, >24 hours.
Main Results:
- Overall success rate for pneumatic reduction was 83% (59/71).
- Success rates improved significantly since 1993 with repeated trials (91% vs. 70%, P < .05).
- Higher success rates were observed in shorter symptom duration groups, but repeated trials benefited all groups.
Conclusions:
- Repeated, delayed pneumatic reduction significantly enhances treatment outcomes for intussusception.
- The strategy of allowing multiple air enema attempts is crucial for improving success rates.
- Pneumatic reduction remains a safe and effective primary treatment for intussusception with no reported complications.
Purpose:
To evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic reduction of intussusception with an emphasis on repeated, delayed trials.
Materials And Methods:
Seventy-one patients with intussusception were treated with air enemas. Before 1993, one trial of air reduction was performed; since 1993, up to three trials of air reduction were performed. The patients were categorized according to the duration of signs and symptoms: less than 12 hours (group A), 12-24 hours (group B), and longer than 24 hours (group C).
Results:
The success rate for air reduction was 83% overall (59 of 71 patients), 89% in group A (25 of 28 patients), 83% in group B (20 of 24 patients), and 74% in group C (14 of 19 patients). The success rate was 70% (19 of 27 patients) before 1993 and 91% (40 of 44 patients) since 1993 (P < .05). When patients in whom air reduction was successful were compared with patients in whom it was unsuccessful, there was a statistically significant difference in radiographic signs of intestinal obstruction and duration of signs and symptoms but no important difference in age or rectal bleeding. There were no episodes of complications.
Conclusion:
Repeated, delayed pneumatic reduction of intussusception improves the outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology

