Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A blended strategy using competitive and regulatory models

T P Weil1, R M Battistella

  • 1Bedford Health Associates, Inc., Management Consultants for Health & Hospital Services, Asheville, NC, USA.

Health Care Management Review
|March 12, 1998
PubMed
Summary

The US health field debate centers on competition versus regulation. This article advocates a blended approach, prioritizing practicality over ideology for better healthcare access and cost control.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responding to challenges in health management education.

The Journal of health administration education·2002
Same author

Fiscal options for America's best hospitals.

Managed care interface·2001
Same author

Horizontal mergers in the United States health field: some practical realities.

Health services management research·2001
Same author

Rolling back third-party intrusions in the practice of medicine.

Physician executive·2001
Same author

Commentary: public disclosure in the health field: is there a relevant option?

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2001
Same author

Is vertical integration adding value to health systems?

Managed care interface·2000

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Public health economics
  • Healthcare systems analysis

Background:

  • The US healthcare system faces ongoing debate regarding market competition versus government regulation.
  • Existing models aim to control healthcare costs and improve access to care.
  • Policy decisions are often polarized between extreme market-driven and regulatory approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of market-driven and regulatory models in US healthcare.
  • To propose an alternative policy framework for healthcare reform.
  • To evaluate the feasibility and potential acceptance of a hybrid healthcare strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of market-driven and regulatory healthcare models.
  • Examination of policy implications for cost containment and access to care.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of alignment with American cultural and political values.

    • Main Results:

    • Neither purely market-driven nor purely regulatory approaches are optimal for the US healthcare system.
    • A blended strategy offers a more practical and effective path forward.
    • Hybrid models are more congruent with national values and are likely to gain traction.

    Conclusions:

    • Advocating for a blended approach in US healthcare policy, emphasizing practicality.
    • The proposed mixed strategy is predicted to achieve acceptance, legitimacy, and momentum.
    • This hybrid model aligns with American cultural and political values, suggesting a viable future direction for healthcare reform.