Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The analyst's knowledge and authority

S A Mitchell

    The Psychoanalytic Quarterly
    |March 12, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Psychoanalytic theory is evolving, with current debates focusing on the knowledge analysts provide and their authority. This work offers a new perspective aligned with broader cultural shifts in understanding knowledge.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Patient experience and burden of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn: a systematic review.

    BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2025
    Same author

    Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

    BMC medical research methodology·2025
    Same author

    Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

    BMC neurology·2024
    Same author

    Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period.

    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2023
    Same author

    Linguistic validation of the simplified Chinese version of the US National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).

    BMC cancer·2020
    Same author

    Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.

    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2019
    Same journal

    Lucy LaFarge (1948-2025).

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Freud in His Psychosocial Generation: Durkheim, Simmel, Weber, and Du Bois.

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note.

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Chodorow Comment.

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    Solace.

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    Same journal

    On Being and Knowing: A Response to Thomas Ogden's "Ontological" Model.

    The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychoanalytic theory
    • Epistemology
    • Philosophy of mind

    Background:

    • Ongoing debates in psychoanalysis concern the nature of knowledge shared by analysts and patients.
    • These discussions highlight fundamental disagreements about epistemology and the mind's structure.
    • Traditional psychoanalytic views are being challenged by evolving perspectives on knowledge acquisition and authority.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address current controversies regarding psychoanalytic knowledge and authority.
    • To propose an approach to these issues that aligns with contemporary cultural understandings of knowledge.
    • To explore the implications of this new approach for psychoanalytic theory and clinical practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of psychoanalytic theory and epistemology.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of traditional psychoanalytic stances with broader cultural shifts in thinking about knowledge.
  • Exploration of theoretical and clinical implications.

    • Main Results:

    • Identifies deep-seated differences in assumptions about epistemology and the nature of mind within psychoanalysis.
    • Presents an alternative approach to psychoanalytic knowledge and authority.
    • This approach is argued to be more congruent with general cultural trends in understanding knowledge.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed approach offers a way to reconcile psychoanalytic theory with broader epistemological shifts.
    • This has significant implications for how psychoanalytic knowledge is understood and applied in clinical settings.
    • Re-evaluating the nature of knowledge and authority is crucial for the continued evolution of psychoanalytic thought.