Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Malpractice risks for urologists

G W Kaplan1

  • 1Department of Urology, Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.

Urology
|March 12, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Most urologists face malpractice suits, with many expecting multiple claims during their careers. Practice location and duration influence the likelihood of being sued, not professional reputation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Road to pediatric urology subcertification: a 25-year journey.

Journal of pediatric urology·2019
Same author

Examining trends in the treatment of ureterocele yields no definitive solution.

Journal of pediatric urology·2014
Same author

The undescended testis: changes over the past several decades.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Is routine karyotyping necessary in the evaluation of hypospadias and cryptorchidism?

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux or obstruction associated with complete ureteral duplication.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

The ultrasonic description of postpubertal testicles in men who have undergone prepubertal orchiopexy for cryptorchidism.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Extended versus Standard Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Intractable Epistaxis and Severe Hypertension in a Young Woman.

Urology·2026
Same journal

A 53-Year-Old Man with Elevated PSA and a Cystic Pelvic Lesion.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Low-Grade, Papillary Bladder Tumors A plea for in-office fulguration.

Urology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Malpractice Law

Background:

  • Malpractice litigation is a significant concern for physicians.
  • Understanding the frequency of claims against urologists is crucial for risk management and professional development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of malpractice suits filed against urologists in the United States.
  • To identify factors associated with the frequency of malpractice claims in urology.

Main Methods:

  • Anonymous surveys were sent to urologists listed in "Best Doctors in America" (Group A).
  • Professional responsibility histories of candidates for American Board of Urology recertification in 1996 were reviewed (Group B).

Main Results:

  • 77% of surveyed urologists (Group A) reported being sued, with an average of 2.36 claims per physician sued. The claims frequency was 0.09 per physician per year.

Related Experiment Videos

  • 49% of urologists up for recertification (Group B) reported claims, averaging 1.9 per physician sued. The claims frequency was also 0.09 per physician per year.
  • Urologists in specific regions (Northeast, North Central, Mid-Atlantic) were less likely to be sued. Claim payment rates were 44% (Group A) and 29% (Group B).

    • Conclusions:

    • Most urologists will likely face multiple malpractice suits during their careers.
    • The duration of a urologist's practice is positively correlated with the likelihood of facing a lawsuit.
    • Geographic practice location may influence malpractice suit frequency, while professional reputation does not appear to be a significant factor.