Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcome measures for urinary incontinence

J G Blaivas1

  • 1New York Hospital, Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.

Urology
|March 12, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developing reliable and valid instruments for urinary incontinence (UI) treatment efficacy is crucial. Current methods lack validation, necessitating further research for standardized outcome assessment in UI.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to the Editor.

The Canadian journal of urology·2018
Same author

Seventh Report on the Standardisation of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function: Lower Urinary Tract Rehabilitation Techniques.

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2016
Same author

Nocturia in men.

International journal of clinical practice. Supplement·2007
Same author

Genital prolapse.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same author

Overactive bladder: symptom or syndrome?

BJU international·2003
Same author

The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence.

BJU international·2003

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Device Development

Background:

  • Urinary incontinence (UI) treatment efficacy assessment requires robust and standardized instruments.
  • Existing methods for evaluating UI treatment outcomes lack universal acceptance and validation.
  • The Urodynamics Society has published reports on UI classification and efficacy standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline essential data collection for developing validated instruments for UI treatment outcomes.
  • To discuss the requirements for reproducible and well-accepted efficacy measures in UI.
  • To guide the development of reliable tools for assessing UI treatment success.

Main Methods:

  • Review of reports from the Urodynamics Society on UI classification and efficacy standards.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of key components for reliable and valid efficacy instruments.
  • Discussion of primary and secondary outcome variables for UI treatment trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Recommended instruments include histories, questionnaires, physical exams, urodynamics, voiding diaries, and pad tests.
    • Primary outcome variables: incontinent episodes, urinary loss volume, and incontinence type.
    • Secondary measures: patient satisfaction, quality of life, bladder symptoms, and urodynamic variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Currently, no universally validated, reproducible, or well-accepted efficacy instruments exist for UI treatment outcomes.
    • Further research and development are essential to create standardized efficacy assessment tools for UI.
    • The findings underscore the need for improved methodologies in UI clinical trials.