Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A NIDSEC primer: Part 2--Setting the standards

R L Simpson1

  • 1NIDSEC, Washington, DC 20024, USA.

Nursing Management
|March 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The American Nurses Association

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A comparative study of the effects of different bioactive fillers in PLGA matrix composites and their suitability as bone substitute materials: A thermo-mechanical and in vitro investigation.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2015
Same author

Cystic disease of the lung.

Clinical proceedings - Children's Hospital of the District of Columbia·2010
Same author

Cultural diversity in the Information Age.

Nursing administration quarterly·2008
Same author

Taking the "I" road: from nursing informatician to CEO, CIO, or CFO.

Nursing administration quarterly·2008
Same author

Mapping an IT career: the future of nursing.

Nursing administration quarterly·2008
Same author

Need to know: essential survival skills for the information age.

Nursing administration quarterly·2008

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Informatics
  • Health Information Systems

Background:

  • The American Nurses Association (ANA) established the Nursing Information and Data Set Evaluation Center (NIDSEC).
  • NIDSEC developed criteria for evaluating nursing information systems.
  • These criteria address nomenclature, clinical content, clinical data repository, and general system characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To focus on two key dimensions of nursing data sets and associated systems.
  • To analyze the clinical data repository and general system characteristics for nursing information systems.

Main Methods:

  • Review of NIDSEC's published evaluation criteria.
  • Focused analysis on the clinical data repository dimension.
  • Focused analysis on the general system characteristics dimension.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Detailed examination of the clinical data repository requirements for nursing documentation.
  • Evaluation of general system characteristics essential for effective nursing information systems.
  • Identification of specific criteria within these two dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the clinical data repository and general system characteristics is crucial for evaluating nursing information systems.
  • These dimensions are vital for ensuring systems effectively support nursing practice documentation.
  • The NIDSEC criteria provide a framework for assessing system quality.