Related Experiment Videos
Marginal adaption of two esthetic complete crowns
1College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh.
Summary
This study compared the fit of metal crowns, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns, and Dicor crowns. Metal crowns offered the best fit before porcelain application, while PFM crowns were oversized and Dicor crowns undersized.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Prosthodontics
- Biomaterials engineering
Background:
- Accurate crown fit is crucial for long-term dental restoration success.
- Evaluating the marginal fit of different crown types is essential for clinical application.
- Previous studies have shown variability in the fit of various dental crown materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns and Dicor crowns.
- To assess the fit of PFM crowns before and after porcelain application using the porcelain-margin technique.
- To establish which crown type offers superior fit in an in-vitro setting.
Main Methods:
- Fabrication of twenty artificial crowns for in-vitro testing.
- Utilized a hardened stainless steel five-piece die assembly for uniform wax patterns and measurements.
- Compared the fit of ten PFM crowns (pre- and post-porcelain application) with ten Dicor crowns.
Main Results:
- Metal substructures of PFM crowns exhibited the best fit prior to porcelain application.
- PFM crowns demonstrated an oversized fit after porcelain application.
- Dicor crowns consistently presented an undersized fit compared to the die assembly.
Conclusions:
- The marginal fit of PFM crowns can be compromised by the porcelain application process.
- Dicor crowns may present fit challenges due to their undersized nature.
- Pre-porcelain metal substructures offer superior marginal accuracy in this in-vitro comparison.