Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Postperceptual effects and P300 latency

H Leuthold1, W Sommer

  • 1Department of Biological Psychology/Psychophysiology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Germany. leuthold@rz.hu-berlin.de

Psychophysiology
|March 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eye contact in active and passive viewing: Event-related brain potential evidence from a combined eye tracking and EEG study.

Neuropsychologia·2020
Same author

Large lateralized EDAN-like brain potentials in a gaze-shift detection task.

Psychophysiology·2019
Same author

Role for primary immunosuppression with everolimus after pulmonary transplantation.

Transplant immunology·2018
Same author

Single lung transplantation from a donor 8 months after double lung transplantation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2018
Same author

Association of Higher CD4<sup>+</sup> CD25<sup>high</sup> CD127<sup>low</sup> , FoxP3<sup>+</sup> , and IL-2<sup>+</sup> T Cell Frequencies Early After Lung Transplantation With Less Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction at Two Years.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2016
Same author

Dual energy CT allows for improved characterization of response to antiangiogenic treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

European radiology·2016
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

P300 latency, a measure of brain activity, is influenced by perceptual and response selection processes, not just stimulus evaluation. This finding challenges previous assumptions about P300 latency in cognitive tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • P300 latency is traditionally viewed as a chronometric index for perceptual processing duration.
  • Existing evidence supporting this view is debated, necessitating further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of perceptual processes, response selection, and motoric processes on P300 latency.
  • To examine the validity of P300 latency as a sole indicator of perceptual processing duration.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilizing a two-choice spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task.
  • Analysis of reaction time and P300 latency under varying perceptual difficulty and spatial SRC conditions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Additive effects of perceptual difficulty and spatial SRC were observed in both reaction time and P300 latency.
  • P300 latency, when averaged, demonstrated insensitivity to motoric processes in Experiment 2.
  • Spatial SRC influenced P300 latency, contradicting the notion of its sole sensitivity to stimulus evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • P300 latency is affected by factors beyond initial stimulus evaluation, including response selection.
  • P300 latency can differentiate between premotoric and motoric processing stages.
  • A response conflict model is proposed to explain the SRC effect on P300 latency.