Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial aspects of interspecific competition

R Durrett1, S Levin

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. rtd1@cornell.edu

Theoretical Population Biology
|May 2, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial Moran models, II: cancer initiation in spatially structured tissue.

Journal of mathematical biology·2015
Same author

Distribution and abundance of microsatellites in the yeast genome can Be explained by a balance between slippage events and point mutations.

Molecular biology and evolution·2000
Same author

Lessons on pattern formation from planet WATOR.

Journal of theoretical biology·2000
Same author

Spatial models for hybrid zones.

Heredity·2000
Same author

Local frequency dependence and global coexistence.

Theoretical population biology·1999
Same author

From individuals to epidemics.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·1996
Same journal

Applying invasion criterion to cultural evolution.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

The joint spectrum over trees under the Kingman coalescent with varying population.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Statistical test to compare the linkage model and the admixture model based on central limit results.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Threshold dynamics in age-structured distributions with expanding support: A unified mathematical framework.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic-statistical model for the expansion of ash dieback.

Theoretical population biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of an intraguild predation system with optimal foraging and harvesting.

Theoretical population biology·2026
See all related articles

Spatial distribution significantly impacts species competition outcomes. A dominant species will eventually take over, while cyclic competition shows stable spatial structures in models, unlike nonspatial ones.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Population Dynamics

Background:

  • Species competition is a fundamental ecological process.
  • Spatial structure can influence ecological dynamics.
  • Stochastic spatial models offer insights into complex ecological interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of spatial distribution on species competition outcomes.
  • To analyze the interplay between competition and dispersal.
  • To explore cyclic competition dynamics in spatial versus nonspatial models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized several variants of a stochastic spatial model.
  • Rigorous mathematical proofs for competitive advantage scenarios.
  • Analysis of two-species systems with varying dispersal distances.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of spatial and nonspatial models for three-species cyclic competition.

    • Main Results:

    • A competitively superior species inevitably dominates the system.
    • Trade-offs between competition and dispersal distance were examined.
    • Spatial models revealed stable, structured distributions in cyclic competition, contrasting with unstable cycles in nonspatial models.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial structure is crucial for understanding species competition dynamics.
    • Dominance and stable coexistence patterns are strongly influenced by spatial factors.
    • Stochastic spatial models provide more realistic predictions for ecological competition, especially in cyclic relationships.