Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic stoma formation for faecal diversion

M A Hollyoak1, J Lumley, R W Stitz

  • 1Colorectal Unit, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

The British Journal of Surgery
|March 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound treatment for breast engorgement: A randomised double blind trial.

The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
Same author

The ideal ileal-pouch design: a long-term randomized control trial of J- vs W-pouch construction.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2012
Same author

Surgical outcomes in steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: the impact of rescue therapy.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2012
Same author

Laparoscopic resection of advanced colorectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2011
Same author

Optimal port site placement.

Techniques in coloproctology·2010
Same author

Editorial-The next 50 years.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009

Laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion offers significant benefits over open surgery. This minimally invasive approach reduces operating time, speeds bowel function recovery, and shortens hospital stays, improving patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Intestinal stoma creation is often necessary for fecal diversion.
  • Open surgical techniques have traditionally been used for stoma formation.
  • Laparoscopic approaches may offer advantages for specific indications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic intestinal stoma formation.
  • To compare laparoscopic stoma creation with traditional open surgery for fecal diversion.
  • To assess key patient outcomes including operating time, recovery, and hospital stay.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 55 stoma formations (40 laparoscopic, 15 open) at a single institution.
  • Analysis of conversion rates from laparoscopic to open procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of operating time, time to return of bowel function, and hospital stay between groups.

    • Main Results:

    • A low conversion rate of 5% from laparoscopic to open surgery was observed.
    • Laparoscopic stoma formation demonstrated significantly reduced operating times (54 vs. 72 min).
    • Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures experienced faster return of bowel function (1.6 vs. 2.2 days) and shorter hospital stays (7.4 vs. 12.6 days).

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic stoma formation is a safe and suitable technique for the majority of patients requiring fecal diversion.
    • The laparoscopic approach appears to yield superior results compared to open surgery, with reduced morbidity and mortality.
    • This minimally invasive method offers significant advantages in terms of recovery and resource utilization.