Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Descriptors of corneal shape

R Lindsay1, G Smith, D Atchison

  • 1Victorian College of Optometry, Carlton, Australia.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|March 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Liability and general risk management issues in ambulatory surgery care.

QRC advisor·2001
Same author

H.L. Liou and N.A. Brennan (1996). The prediction of spherical aberration with schematic eyes. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16(4), 348-354.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·1998
Same author

Oblique astigmatism of the Indiana eye.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1998
Same author

Visual and vestibular components of motion sickness.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1996
Same author

VDT screen reflections and accommodation response.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·1994
Same author

NASA's Space Life Sciences Training Program.

Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)·1994
Same journal

Randomized comparison of lipid-containing and non-lipid-containing artificial tears on tear film dynamics over a 3-month period.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Visits to optometrists or ophthalmologists by U.S. school-aged children with autism: Estimates from the 2022-2023 National Survey of Children's Health.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine- and hydrogen peroxide-based soft contact lens care solutions.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Agreement between ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer metrics from widefield optical coherence tomography and Goldmann II, III, and V in glaucoma.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Repeatability of SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in macular disease.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Reflections on emerging therapies for inherited retinal diseases following a community education event: A qualitative exploration.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
See all related articles

Understanding corneal shape is crucial with new videokeratoscopy technology. This note clarifies relationships between different corneal shape parameters like p, Q, and e, aiding accurate quantification.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology and Optometry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Corneal Topography

Background:

  • Videokeratoscopy provides unprecedented detail on corneal contour.
  • Quantifying corneal shape accurately remains a challenge.
  • Historically, ellipses and conic sections (p, Q, e) have approximated corneal profiles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the interrelationships between various parameters used to describe corneal shape.
  • To provide clarity on the mathematical connections between different corneal shape descriptors.
  • To aid researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate parameters for corneal analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established mathematical definitions for corneal shape parameters.
  • Analysis of the geometric relationships between elliptical and conic section descriptors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of parameter usage in optometric and ophthalmological literature.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstration of the mathematical equivalence and differences between parameters like p, Q, and e.
    • Clarification of how these parameters relate to the underlying elliptical approximation.
    • Identification of potential ambiguities in the application of different shape descriptors.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear understanding of the relationships between corneal shape parameters is essential for accurate analysis.
    • This technical note provides a unified framework for interpreting various corneal shape descriptors.
    • Improved understanding facilitates more precise characterization of corneal topography using videokeratoscopy data.