Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Formaldehyde concentration in diagnostic patch testing: comparison of 1% with 2%

A Trattner1, J D Johansen, T Menné

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tiqva, Israel.

Contact Dermatitis
|March 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary

The formaldehyde patch test at 1% concentration is recommended for diagnosing formaldehyde allergy. While 1% and 2% showed similar allergy detection rates, 2% caused more irritant reactions, suggesting 1% is optimal.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MTV-guided radiotherapy bridging in large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

Pandemic of sensitivity to acrylate containing nail cosmetic among young Israeli women? Result of patch testing 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in the European baseline series.

Contact dermatitis·2024
Same author

A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

Prevalence of dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices used by children and adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and questionnaire study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

Improved outcomes of large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CD19 CAR T in the UK over time.

British journal of haematology·2023
Same author

CAR T in patients with large B-cell lymphoma not fit for autologous transplant.

British journal of haematology·2023

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Allergology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Formaldehyde exposure is widespread from consumer products and industrial sources.
  • Diagnosing formaldehyde allergy relies heavily on patch testing due to difficulties in historical diagnosis.
  • Recommended formaldehyde patch test concentrations have decreased over time, aiming to reduce irritation and false positives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of 1% and 2% formaldehyde patch tests.
  • To evaluate the frequency, strength, irritancy, and relevance of positive patch test reactions.
  • To determine the optimal formaldehyde concentration for reliable allergy diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 3734 consecutively patch-tested patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simultaneous testing with 1% and 2% formaldehyde in water.
  • Assessment of patch test reactions at days 2, 3-4, and 7 for allergy, irritancy, and relevance.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant difference in allergic reactions between 1% and 2% formaldehyde concentrations.
    • The 2% formaldehyde concentration resulted in significantly more irritant reactions.
    • Most positive reactions observed on day 2 developed into true positives by day 3-4, with minimal additional findings at day 7.

    Conclusions:

    • A 1% formaldehyde patch test concentration is recommended for diagnosing formaldehyde allergy.
    • The 1% concentration offers comparable diagnostic accuracy for allergic reactions with reduced irritancy.
    • Current evidence supports the reduction in formaldehyde patch test concentration to 1%.