Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Salmonella</i> in pigs slaughtered in Ecuador: prevalence, serotypes, genotypes and antibiotic resistance.

Veterinary and animal science·2025
Same author

[Translated article] Fractional Laser for Ablative Resurfacing in Onychomycosis.

Actas dermo-sifiliograficas·2024
Same author

Multicentre, prospective, randomized control non-inferiority trial of bladder catheter management in colon surgery.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2023
Same author

Fractional Laser for Ablative Resurfacing in Onychomycosis.

Actas dermo-sifiliograficas·2023
Same author

Association between a Frailty Index from Common Laboratory Values and Vital Signs (FI-LAB) and Hospital and Post-Hospital Outcomes in Veterans with COVID-19 Infection.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2023
Same author

Oncological monitoring after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal neoplasia.

Techniques in coloproctology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

The gap effect during visual and auditory stimulation using manual responses

C Gómez1, S Millán, M Atienza

  • 1Dept. de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicologia, University of Seville, Spain. cgomez@cica.es

Biological Psychology
|March 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Temporal gaps between warning and imperative signals improve reaction time (RT). This gap effect in human participants shows learning and suggests independent warning and attention disengagement processes.

More Related Videos

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reaction time (RT) is a fundamental measure in cognitive psychology.
  • Temporal cues can influence RT, but the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.
  • Understanding signal processing is crucial for optimizing human performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of a temporal gap between warning and imperative signals on manual reaction time.
  • To determine if this gap effect is learned or innate.
  • To explore the role of signal predictiveness and salience in modulating the gap effect.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted with naive human participants.
  • Manual reaction time (RT) was measured using peripheral visual and monoaural auditory stimuli.
  • Variations included predictive/non-predictive gaps, salient/non-salient gaps, and variable temporal gaps.

Main Results:

  • A significant facilitation in RT was observed for both visual and auditory targets when a temporal gap was present.
  • The gap effect demonstrated a learning component, increasing over successive trials.
  • Facilitation occurred only when the gap was predictive and salient, suggesting specific processing requirements.

Conclusions:

  • The temporal gap between signals facilitates reaction time, indicating an improvement in stimulus processing.
  • The observed learning suggests that participants adapt to the predictive nature of the gap.
  • The findings support a dual-process model involving independent warning and attention disengagement mechanisms.