Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ceramics for total hip replacement--what a surgeon should know

G Willmann1

  • 1Medical Product Division, CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany.

Orthopedics
|March 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary

This review examines the use of ceramic materials in total hip replacements. It finds that ceramic prostheses, particularly those with alumina-on-alumina wear couples, reduce wear and osteolysis compared to traditional metal-on-polyethylene implants. Clinical data show that ceramic prostheses have become standard in THR over the past 25 years. The review highlights the advantages of ceramic materials but does not claim they are perfect solutions. Surgeons should consider ceramic-on-ceramic couples for optimal wear resistance. The findings do not suggest new materials but synthesize existing clinical evidence on ceramic prostheses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alternate bearing surfaces: Ceramic-on-ceramic.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

[Transcorneal electrical stimulation in primary open angle glaucoma].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2016
Same author

[Effects of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with Stargardt's disease].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2013
Same author

[Bilateral disc-like corneal opacity before cataract extraction].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2011
Same author

A new DTL-electrode holder for recording of electroretinograms in animals.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2010
Same author

[Ceramic couplings in orthopedic surgery].

Der Orthopade·2003

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery materials research
  • Biomedical engineering in joint replacement
  • Ceramic materials in medical devices

Background:

Total hip replacement (THR) relies on durable materials to minimize long-term complications. Prior research has shown that polyethylene wear contributes to osteolysis and implant failure. Surgeons have long sought alternatives to metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Alumina and zirconia ceramics were introduced as potential solutions. These materials promised lower wear rates and improved patient outcomes. However, the clinical effectiveness of ceramic prostheses remained uncertain. No prior work had resolved whether ceramic-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings offered the best balance of durability and safety. This gap motivated a review of clinical data on ceramic prostheses in THR. The goal was to clarify the current evidence on ceramic materials' performance in hip implants.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ceramic prostheses in THR. It focuses on comparing ceramic-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic wear couples. The study seeks to identify advantages and limitations of each material type. It also addresses the historical timeline of ceramic implant introduction. The motivation stems from surgeons' need for evidence-based guidance on material selection. The review considers wear rates, osteolysis, and revision risks as key outcome measures. It does not propose new materials but synthesizes existing clinical data. The findings aim to inform surgical decision-making regarding ceramic prostheses.

Keywords:
ceramic hip implantstotal hip replacement materialswear couples in THRalumina-on-polyethylene

Frequently Asked Questions

Ceramic prostheses reduce wear and osteolysis compared to metal-on-polyethylene implants, according to clinical data.

Alumina ceramics have been used in femoral heads for about 25 years, while zirconia was introduced more recently.

The alumina-on-alumina wear couple has the lowest wear rate among ceramic prostheses, as reported in clinical studies.

Polyethylene is used as a bearing surface in ceramic-on-polyethylene couples, which are common in total hip replacements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach includes a synthesis of clinical data published in the literature. It examines outcomes of alumina and zirconia prostheses in THR. The study compares wear rates between ceramic-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic couples. It analyzes historical adoption timelines of ceramic materials in THR. The authors assess clinical evidence on osteolysis and revision rates. No new experiments or patient data were collected. The synthesis relies on published clinical results from the past 25 years. The focus is on material performance rather than surgical technique.

Main Results:

Ceramic femoral heads reduce wear and osteolysis compared to metal-on-polyethylene implants. Alumina-on-polyethylene and zirconia-on-polyethylene have become standard in THR. The lowest wear rate is observed with alumina-on-alumina wear couples. Clinical data show reduced revision rates with ceramic prostheses. No significant differences in osteolysis were reported between alumina and zirconia. The review highlights the importance of material selection in THR outcomes. It confirms that ceramic prostheses offer advantages over traditional materials. The findings suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic couples may provide the best wear resistance.

Conclusions:

The authors state that ceramic prostheses reduce wear and osteolysis in THR compared to metal alternatives. Alumina and zirconia have proven clinical effectiveness over the past 25 years. Alumina-on-alumina wear couples offer the lowest wear rate among ceramic options. The review does not claim ceramic prostheses are universally superior but highlights their benefits. Surgeons should consider ceramic-on-ceramic couples for optimal wear resistance. The findings do not suggest ceramic prostheses eliminate all implant complications. The authors emphasize the need for continued clinical evaluation of ceramic materials. No new material types or surgical techniques are proposed in this review.

No, ceramic prostheses reduce but do not eliminate wear, as shown by clinical evidence on wear rates.

The authors suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic couples may provide the best wear resistance, based on current clinical data.