Related Experiment Videos
Mandibular mobility and occlusal relationships after orthognathic surgery
1Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, England.
Summary
Orthognathic surgery outcomes vary by procedure. Le Fort I osteotomy improved mandibular mobility, while other procedures showed different occlusal interference patterns, impacting jaw function post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Orthodontics
- Biomechanical Engineering
Background:
- Orthognathic surgery corrects skeletal discrepancies.
- Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is a traditional post-surgical stabilization method.
- Assessing outcomes without MMF is crucial for patient function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate mandibular mobility and occlusal interferences after orthognathic surgery without MMF.
- To compare different surgical techniques regarding functional outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 42 patients.
- Categorization of surgical procedures: Le Fort I, mandibular advancement, bimaxillary advancement, mandibular setback, and combined maxillary advancement/mandibular setback.
- Assessment of mandibular mobility and occlusal contacts at least 3 months post-surgery.
Main Results:
- Le Fort I osteotomy showed significantly higher mean maximum protrusion and lateral excursions.
- Mandibular advancement and bimaxillary advancement resulted in greater end-of-treatment overjet.
- Increased right lateral non-working-side contacts were noted in mandibular setback and combined procedures.
- Severe interference between retruded contact position and intercuspal position was unique to the mandibular setback group.
Conclusions:
- Surgical technique significantly influences post-orthognathic surgery mandibular mobility and occlusal interference patterns.
- Le Fort I osteotomy appears to offer better mandibular mobility.
- Specific procedures carry higher risks of occlusal interferences, necessitating careful treatment planning.