Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reconstruction techniques in oral carcinoma

K Altman1, C M Avery, P A Johnson

  • 1Maxillofacial Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford.

Dental Update
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonlinear mesoscopic elasticity revealed by passive seismic monitoring of a rock column during drilling operations.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Machine Learning Reveals the Seismic Signature of Eruptive Behavior at Piton de la Fournaise Volcano.

Geophysical research letters·2020
Same author

Low-dose IL-2 induces CD56<sup>bright</sup> NK regulation of T cells via NKp44 and NKp46.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2020
Same author

Prevalence of bacterial contamination in 50% dextrose vials in varying storage conditions after multiple punctures.

The Journal of small animal practice·2018
Same author

Anti-Müllerian hormone type II receptor in avian follicle development.

Biology of reproduction·2018
Same author

Forehead reduction and orbital contouring in facial feminisation surgery for transgender females.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2018

Oral cancer surgery can impair speech, chewing, and swallowing. This article reviews reconstruction methods, their pros and cons, and ideal usage scenarios for head and neck surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Head and Neck Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Oral carcinoma resection often leads to significant functional deficits.
  • Defects impact speech, mastication, and swallowing.
  • Effective reconstruction is crucial for patient quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss available reconstruction methods for oral defects.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of each technique.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting the optimal reconstruction approach.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current surgical reconstruction techniques.
  • Analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes.
  • Clinical guideline development based on evidence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Various reconstruction methods exist, each with unique benefits and drawbacks.
  • Technique selection depends on defect size, location, and patient factors.
  • Optimal reconstruction improves functional and aesthetic results.

Conclusions:

  • Reconstruction following oral cancer resection is essential for restoring function.
  • A thorough understanding of available methods aids surgical decision-making.
  • Tailored reconstruction strategies enhance patient outcomes.