Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Integration and interference in the cerebral hemispheres: relations with hemispheric specialization

G M Grimshaw1

  • 1University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. grimshaw@csusm.edu

Brain and Cognition
|June 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Brain hemispheres process speech differently. This study found no link between complementary brain specialization and processing interference, supporting a response selection stage hypothesis for equivalent interference.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2006
Same author

Evaluation of molecular tests for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2003
Same author

Are audits wasting resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review criteria.

Quality & safety in health care·2003
Same author

Handedness in boys with gender identity disorder.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2001
Same author

Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same author

Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care: an assessment of international guidelines.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • The brain's two hemispheres often specialize in distinct cognitive functions.
  • Linguistic information is typically processed in the left hemisphere, while prosodic information is processed in the right.
  • Individual differences in hemispheric specialization may influence speech processing efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between linguistic and prosodic information during speech processing.
  • To compare interference effects in a Stroop-like task between individuals with complementary versus noncomplementary hemispheric specialization.
  • To test the hypothesis that interference is equivalent between and within hemispheres at the response selection stage.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized an individual differences approach comparing two groups: complementary specialization (opposite hemispheres) and noncomplementary specialization (same hemisphere).
  • Employed a Stroop-like task to measure interference between linguistic and prosodic speech dimensions.
  • Analyzed interference patterns in relation to participants' specialization profiles.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant relationship was found between complementary specialization and the degree of processing interference.
    • Interference effects did not differ based on whether linguistic and prosodic information were processed in the same or opposite hemispheres.
    • Findings suggest that the stage at which interference occurs is critical.

    Conclusions:

    • Complementary hemispheric specialization for speech processing does not reduce interference.
    • Interference effects appear to be equivalent regardless of whether processes are lateralized to one hemisphere or shared across both.
    • The results support the hypothesis that interference arises from a common response selection mechanism, irrespective of hemispheric processing patterns.