Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should a laparoscopic appendectomy be done?

H Fallahzadeh1

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Columbia Lake Cumberland Regional Hospital, Somerset, USA.

The American Surgeon
|April 1, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of an education program based on the theory of planned behavior for salt intake in individuals at risk of hypertension.

Health education research·2019
Same author

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in combination with low-calorie diet on anthropometric indices and androgen hormones in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2017
Same author

Effects of Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension diet on androgens, antioxidant status and body composition in overweight and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2017
Same author

Evaluation of In Vitro Effectiveness of Seven Disinfectants over Controlling Candida on Complete Dentures.

Iranian Red Crescent medical journal·2012
Same author

Prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache among school children in Yazd, Iran.

Journal of pediatric neurosciences·2012
Same author

HIV/AIDS epidemic features and trends in Iran, 1986-2006.

AIDS and behavior·2008
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy did not improve hospital stay, reduce narcotic needs, or lower costs compared to open surgery. This surgical technique is not recommended for appendicitis cases.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy aims to improve surgical outcomes.
  • Key criteria for adoption include reduced hospital stay, less pain, faster recovery, cost-effectiveness, and fewer complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare laparoscopic appendectomy with the traditional open technique.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy based on established surgical criteria.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 60 laparoscopic and 60 open appendectomies (1993-1996).
  • Comparison of hospital stay, narcotic requirements, return to normal activity, cost, and complication rates.
  • Analysis included patient employment type.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy showed no significant decrease in hospital stay (2.1 vs. 1.4 days) or narcotic use (38.5 mg vs. 19.8 mg).
  • Laparoscopic surgery incurred higher costs ($3650 more) due to longer operative and preparation times.
  • Return to normal activity was only faster for patients in heavy manual labor (1 week shorter).
  • No difference in complication rates was observed between the two techniques.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy does not meet the criteria for widespread adoption over open surgery for appendicitis.
  • The current findings do not support the recommendation of laparoscopic appendectomy for suspected appendicitis.