[Acute cholecystitis: video-laparoscopic or laparotomic treatment? Role of the immune system]

Recent clinical studies suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) causes less depression of cell-mediated immunity than open cholecystectomy. LC is a so called "mini invasive" surgical presidia, and on the basis of this consideration we have investigated if and how the immune response is modified in patients with acute cholecystitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compare to patients undergone open cholecystectomy. Immune-activity (neutrophils, total lymphocytes count, lymphocytes subpopulations, HLA-DR, 6-Interleukin, skin multitests) was evaluated in 28 patients 24-36 hours before surgery and p.o. after 1, 3 and 6 days: 16 patients underwent "open" cholecystectomy and 12 LC. One day after surgery patients with open cholecystectomy showed significant increase (p < or = 0.05) of plasma neutrophils and 6-Interleukin, while these parameters were almost unchanged in patients with LC. Moreover, skin tests showed ipo or anergic response in the majority (81.8%) of patients with "open" surgery compare to patients with LC (10.5%): (p < or = 0.05). Finally monocyte antigen HLA-DR was also reduced in patients with "open" cholecystectomy: in this group we also recorded 2 cases (12.5%) of respiratory tract infection. In conclusion, LC for acute cholecystitis, avoids p.o. immunosuppression with better p.o. morbidity compare to open surgery.