Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for every person

¹General Practice Professorial Unit, University of Sydney, Manly Hospital, NSW, Australia.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

|April 3, 1998

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Clinical practice guidelines are conceptually valuable for healthcare providers and patients, but their practical utility remains unproven. Further research is needed to ensure guidelines support individualized patient care.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Patient safety events reported in general practice: a taxonomy.

Quality & safety in health care·2008

Same author

Running effective meetings: a primer for doctors.

Postgraduate medical journal·2006

Same author

Conflict management: a primer for doctors in training.

Postgraduate medical journal·2006

Same author

Co-morbidity in general practice.

Postgraduate medical journal·2005

Same author

Managing osteoarthritis in general practice: a long-term approach.

The Medical journal of Australia·2002

Same author

The relationship between physician cost and functional status in the elderly.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2000

Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Clinical Practice Guidelines
General Practice

Background:

Clinical guidelines are widely assumed to hold significant value in healthcare.
They aim to provide medical certainty, legal protection, and reduce decision-related stress for practitioners.
The impact on general practitioners and consumers, the primary end-users, is a key consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the theoretical worth and practical utility of clinical guidelines for general practitioners and consumers.
To examine the involvement of these end-users in guideline development, implementation, review, and relevance.
To postulate a new role for guidelines that acknowledges the needs and circumstances of end-users.

Main Methods:

Literature review examining the theoretical and practical aspects of clinical guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of the involvement of general practitioners and consumers in the guideline lifecycle.

Exploration of existing research on guideline impact and utility.

Main Results:

Guidelines are conceptually sound but their practical utility for general practitioners and consumers is not yet definitively proven.
The involvement of end-users in guideline processes is crucial for their effectiveness.
Current guidelines may not adequately account for the unique circumstances of clinical practice.

Conclusions:

Clinical guidelines possess conceptual merit but require further validation regarding their practical utility.
A revised role for guidelines is proposed, emphasizing end-user needs and the realities of clinical practice.
Guidelines can form the foundation for sound clinical practice by integrating individual circumstances with consolidated evidence.