Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Halothane 0.2-4% analysis by gas chromatography

I MacDonald, J E Mackenzie

    British Journal of Anaesthesia
    |June 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The katharometer detector offers superior reproducibility and direct concentration proportionality for analyzing gaseous halothane (0.2-4%) compared to flame ionization detectors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Richard L. Atkinson, MD, FTOS, retires as Editor-In-Chief.

    International journal of obesity (2005)·2021
    Same author

    Weight loss for individuals with type 2 diabetes following a very-low-calorie diet in a community-based setting with trained facilitators for 12 weeks.

    Clinical obesity·2015
    Same author

    Long-term weight loss maintenance and management following a VLCD: a 3-year outcome.

    International journal of clinical practice·2013
    Same author

    The application of good clinical practice in nutrition research.

    European journal of clinical nutrition·2012
    Same author

    Bariatric surgery highlights in the International Journal of Obesity.

    International journal of obesity (2005)·2012
    Same author

    Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

    Diabetes & metabolism·2011
    Same journal

    Uncoupling immobility and unconsciousness.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    Same journal

    Single-dose intraoperative methadone QTc effects. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    Same journal

    Direct inhibition of cystathionine-β-synthase by isoflurane contributes to delayed neurocognitive recovery after isoflurane general anaesthesia in mice: interpreting reduced freezing after isoflurane. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 360-74.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    Same journal

    Anticholinergic syndrome or magic: Circe's use of anaesthetic alkaloids in Homer's Odyssey.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    Same journal

    Audit of procedural sedation complications using a novel digital application.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    Same journal

    Social deprivation and morbidity and mortality after surgery. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 1193-1202.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Analytical Chemistry
    • Gas Chromatography

    Background:

    • Accurate quantification of anesthetic gases like halothane is crucial in medical and environmental monitoring.
    • Traditional flame ionization detectors may present limitations in sensitivity and reproducibility for certain gas concentrations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the suitability of the katharometer detector for analyzing gaseous halothane concentrations ranging from 0.2% to 4%.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis using a katharometer detector and a flame ionization detector.
    • Gas chromatography was employed for sample introduction and separation.
    • Peak height analysis was used to determine concentration proportionality and reproducibility.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Katharometer detector peak heights demonstrated direct proportionality to halothane concentration.
  • The katharometer detector exhibited higher reproducibility in peak height measurements compared to the flame ionization detector.
  • The katharometer detector proved effective for the specified range of halothane analysis.

    • Conclusions:

    • The katharometer detector is a more appropriate choice for the quantitative analysis of gaseous halothane (0.2-4%) due to its superior reproducibility and linear response.