Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Comparative study of laparoscopic appendectomy vs open appendectomy]

E Prado1, H García-Alcalá, A Domínguez-Cocco

  • 1Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital General de Puebla.

Revista De Gastroenterologia De Mexico
|April 7, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

OncoNutridos study: Prevalence of disease-related malnutrition according to GLIM criteria in cancer patients in oncohaematology day hospitals.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2025
Same author

Multicenter validation of Early Warning Scores for detection of clinical deterioration in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

Medicina intensiva·2022
Same author

Prediction of fatty acids composition in the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss by using Raman micro-spectroscopy.

Analytica chimica acta·2022
Same author

Multicenter validation of Early Warning Scores for detection of clinical deterioration in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

Medicina intensiva·2021
Same author

Notch3 signaling activation in smooth muscle cells promotes extrauterine growth restriction-induced pulmonary hypertension.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2019
Same author

Influence of the SPR Experimental Conditions on the G-Quadruplex DNA Recognition by Porphyrin Derivatives.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2018

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages over open surgery. This study found it led to faster recovery, less pain, and better cosmetic results.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Appendectomy is a common surgical procedure.
  • Laparoscopic surgery offers potential benefits over traditional open surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of open appendectomy versus laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • To evaluate patient recovery, pain, and cosmetic results between the two surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 40 patients, divided equally into open (Group A) and laparoscopic (Group B) appendectomy groups.
  • Key variables including postoperative pain, oral intake, hospitalization duration, return to normal activities, and cosmesis were assessed.
  • Statistical analysis utilized Student's t test and chi-square with Yates correction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (Group B) demonstrated significantly earlier oral intake restart (p < 0.001).
  • Group B experienced less postoperative pain at 24, 48, and 72 hours (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 respectively).
  • Shorter hospital stays (p < 0.001), earlier return to normal activities (p < 0.001), and superior cosmetic appearance (p < 0.001) were observed in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open appendectomy.
  • The laparoscopic approach provides significant advantages, including reduced pain, faster recovery, and improved cosmesis.