Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Apparent body tilt and postural aftereffect

A Higashiyama1, K Koga

  • 1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan. achan@kic.ritsumei.ac.jp

Perception & Psychophysics
|April 8, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The molecular cartography of malignant and benign sebaceous tumours.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Macroscopic Monozygotic Androgenetic/Biparental Mosaicism: Molecular Characterization and Clinical Implications.

Genes, chromosomes & cancer·2025
Same author

Ovarian reserve may influence the outcome of bone mineral density in patients with long-term use of dienogest.

SAGE open medicine·2022
Same author

The effect of a finite number of monomers available for aggregation at nucleation and micellization in a fixed volume.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

CD73 complexes with emmprin to regulate MMP-2 production from co-cultured sarcoma cells and fibroblasts.

BMC cancer·2019
Same author

Factors Influencing the Changes in Masticatory Performance: The Suita Study.

JDR clinical and translational research·2019
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Body tilt perception is accurately estimated for small angles but overestimated for larger angles. Sensory input from skin and muscles, not the vestibular system, primarily drives body orientation judgments.

Area of Science:

  • Human proprioception
  • Sensory neuroscience
  • Body orientation perception

Background:

  • Understanding how the human body perceives its orientation in space is crucial for fields like robotics, virtual reality, and rehabilitation.
  • Previous research has implicated various sensory systems, including vestibular, proprioceptive, and visual inputs, in maintaining body balance and orientation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy of apparent body tilt perception in the frontal plane under different experimental conditions.
  • To determine the primary sensory modalities responsible for judging body tilt, differentiating between proprioception, vestibular, and joint receptors.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments involving absolute judgments of body tilt were conducted with human subjects.
  • Methods included maintaining normal gravity adaptation, eliminating visual cues, varying chair rotation velocities, and adapting to sustained body tilts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects also performed active adjustments of their body tilt to designated angles.

    • Main Results:

    • Body tilt estimations were accurate for tilts less than 45 degrees and overestimated for larger tilts (45-108 degrees).
    • While chair velocity had a minor effect, body tilt itself was the dominant factor influencing tilt estimation.
    • Adaptation to a sustained tilt reduced subsequent tilt estimations, with a greater reduction for tilts further from the adapted position.

    Conclusions:

    • Body tilt judgments are primarily mediated by a unified sensory process relying on cutaneous and muscular proprioceptors.
    • Vestibular and joint proprioceptors appear to play a lesser role in the perception of lateral body tilt compared to skin and muscle afferents.