Related Experiment Videos
Fecal occult blood testing: clinical value and limitations
1Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Summary
Stool occult blood tests detect colorectal cancer, offering a modest mortality benefit. However, false positives are common, leading to costly investigations and questioning widespread screening justification.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Occult blood in stool is a key indicator for colorectal cancer screening.
- Guaiac slide tests (e.g., Hemoccult II) are widely used but have limitations.
- Technical factors like slide rehydration significantly impact test performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical performance and effectiveness of different stool occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
- To analyze the impact of technical factors, such as slide hydration, on test sensitivity and specificity.
- To assess the mortality benefit and cost-effectiveness of occult blood screening programs.
Main Methods:
- Review of chemical (guaiac), heme-porphyrin, and immunological methods for occult blood detection.
- Analysis of clinical trial data on the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of hydrated and unhydrated Hemoccult tests.
- Evaluation of mortality reduction data associated with periodic occult blood screening.
Main Results:
- Unhydrated Hemoccult shows ~50% sensitivity and ~98% specificity for colorectal cancer; only 5-10% of positive tests are cancer-related.
- Hydrated Hemoccult increases sensitivity but drastically reduces specificity, leading to a ~2% positive predictive value for cancer.
- Periodic occult blood screening (biennial, unhydrated) yields a 15-18% colorectal cancer mortality benefit.
Conclusions:
- Stool occult blood screening provides a significant, albeit modest, mortality benefit for colorectal cancer.
- Poor specificity and low positive predictive values of current tests necessitate careful consideration of screening protocols and costs.
- Despite documented benefits, widespread implementation faces challenges due to compliance, cost, and ethical considerations.