Quantitative prediction of the interaction of midazolam and histamine H2 receptor antagonists in rats
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2026

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays
Published on: February 21, 2020
S Takedomi1, H Matsuo, K Yamano
1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract:
To quantitatively evaluate drug-drug interactions involving metabolic processes in the liver, we attempted to predict the increasing ratio of the plasma concentration of midazolam (MDZ) in the presence of cimetidine (CIM) or nizatidine (NZD) in rats. Under steady-state conditions for the plasma concentration of CIM or NZD, MDZ was administered through the portal vein. The AUC of MDZ in the presence of CIM was 2.5-fold higher than that in the absence of CIM. There was no effect of NZD on the AUC of MDZ. The liver/plasma concentration ratios for CIM and NZD were 4.0 and 2.7, respectively. The estimated liver unbound concentration (CH,f)/plasma unbound concentration (Cp,f) ratios for CIM and NZD were 1.9 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting concentrative hepatic accumulation of both drugs. The oxidative metabolism of MDZ in rat liver microsomes was competitively inhibited by CIM or NZD, and the Ki values of CIM and NZD were 110 and 2600 microM, respectively. Based on these data obtained in vivo and in vitro, the increasing ratios for MDZ in the presence of CIM or NZD were predicted using the equations Rp = 1 + Cp,f/Ki and RH = 1 + CH,f/Ki. The observed increasing ratios in the presence of CIM were very close to RH, compared with Rp. However, Cp, f and CH,f were much less than Ki and there was no difference between Rp and RH in the presence of NZD. Consequently, Cp,f and CH, f were greater than or equal to Ki and Cp,f was not equal to CH,f, as in the presence of CIM, and it was indicated that CH,f was more suitable for quantitatively predicting the drug-drug interactions than was Cp,f.
More Related Videos
07:54Testing Animal Anxiety in Rats: Effects of Open Arm Ledges and Closed Arm Wall Transparency in Elevated Plus Maze Test
Published on: June 29, 2018
08:49Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...