Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Disability: a model and measurement technique

R G Williams, M Johnston, L A Willis

British Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine

|June 1, 1976

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nutrient Intakes and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Among Esophagogastric Cancer Survivors up to 5 Years Post-Surgery.

Nutrition and cancer·2024

Same author

Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study.

BMC cancer·2019

Same author

Outcomes of a Community-Based Paediatric Weight Management Programme in an Irish Midlands Setting.

Irish medical journal·2018

Same author

Patient experiences of a physiotherapy-led multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention after successful treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2018

Same author

Sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer: characterising the impact on muscle strength and physical performance.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2017

Same author

Liming impacts on soils, crops and biodiversity in the UK: A review.

The Science of the total environment·2017

Same journal

Smoking in pregnancy and low weight babies: a statistical consideration.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

Same journal

Cleft lip and palate in the Oxford area. An examination of the evidence for clustering in space and time.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

Same journal

The hazard of old lead mines in Wales.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

Same journal

Developmental and behavioural functions in young children with elevated blood lead levels.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

Same journal

Incidence of diabetes mellitus in Oslo, Norway 1956-65.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

Same journal

Geographical variation mortality from ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales.

British journal of preventive & social medicine·1977

See all related articles

Disability scoring can be arbitrary. This study introduces a new, cumulative pattern model using Guttman scale analysis for more accurate disability assessment and outcome prediction.

Area of Science:

Rehabilitation Medicine
Biostatistics
Disability Studies

Background:

Current disability scoring methods are often subjective and lack standardization.
There is a need for objective and reliable tools to measure disability progression.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and validate a novel model for disability assessment based on cumulative patterns.
To introduce a simple measurement technique for evaluating individual disadvantage and treatment outcomes.

Main Methods:

Development of a disability model based on the hypothesis of regular, cumulative progression.
Application of Guttman scale analysis for model testing and validation.
Utilizing data from community surveys and postsurgical patients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The proposed model demonstrated validity in assessing disability.
Identified key factors contributing to variations in disability scales.
The Guttman scale analysis confirmed cumulative patterns in disability progression.

Conclusions:

The new model offers a simple and objective method for disability measurement.
Implications for predicting recovery or deterioration and evaluating treatment effectiveness.
Provides a foundation for more standardized disability assessment in clinical and research settings.