Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects

G M Blake1, C C Glüer, I Fogelman

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

The British Journal of Radiology
|April 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discrepancies Between Osteoporotic Fracture Evaluations in Men Based on German (DVO) Osteoporosis Guidelines or the FRAX Score.

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association·2022
Same author

Osteoporosis case ascertainment strategies in European and Asian countries: a comparative review.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Pancreas fat quantification with quantitative CT: an MRI correlation analysis.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

Effectiveness of a two-step population-based osteoporosis screening program using FRAX: the randomized Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation (ROSE) study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2017
Same author

Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice.

Bone·2015
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Utility of High-Resolution Semiconductor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Breast Cancer Extent: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Airway Imaging Practices in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Global Survey to Guide Standardized Guidelines.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) offers precise bone density measurements, but quantitative ultrasound (QUS) presents a cheaper alternative for fracture risk assessment in the elderly.

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Osteoporosis significantly impacts the elderly, increasing healthcare costs.
  • New treatments and diagnostic imaging technologies are crucial for fracture prevention.
  • Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides high-precision bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the spine and hip.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of emerging technologies in diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting fracture risk.
  • To compare the utility of peripheral DXA and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for assessing bone health.
  • To determine the suitability of current technologies for widespread diagnostic service provision.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on DXA and QUS technologies for bone assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of prospective studies demonstrating the ability of new technologies to predict osteoporotic fractures.
  • Comparison of cost-effectiveness, precision, and diagnostic interpretation of DXA versus QUS.

    • Main Results:

    • DXA excels in precise BMD measurements but may face limitations in widespread service provision.
    • Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) offers a less expensive alternative for peripheral bone assessment and has shown fracture risk prediction capabilities.
    • QUS exhibits lower precision than DXA and lacks standardized quality control phantoms and clear interpretation guidelines for certain populations.

    Conclusions:

    • While DXA is precise, its broader application for osteoporosis diagnosis is uncertain.
    • QUS is a cost-effective alternative with proven fracture risk prediction, but precision and standardization issues need addressing.
    • Further research is required to optimize QUS interpretation, particularly for younger women, and to develop quality control standards.