Related Experiment Videos
Intensive case management for the severely mentally ill. Controlled trial
1Maudsley Hospital, London.
Summary
Intensive clinical case management (ICM) did not improve clinical outcomes for severe mental illness patients. However, ICM enhanced patient quality of life and service satisfaction, ensuring continuous engagement with care.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Mental Health Services Research
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Severe mental illness (SMI) presents challenges in treatment adherence and engagement.
- Identifying effective management strategies for 'hard to treat' SMI populations is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of intensive clinical case management (ICM) against standard community care for SMI patients.
- To evaluate the impact of ICM on clinical outcomes, service utilization, and patient satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 70 'hard to treat' SMI patients in a deprived urban area.
- Patients were assigned to either ICM (8 patients/worker) or standard community psychiatric nursing care (30 patients/worker).
- Outcomes assessed at 9 and 18 months included hospital admissions, symptomatology, social functioning, and patient satisfaction.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in patient symptomatology, social behavior, or social functioning between groups.
- Patients receiving ICM reported significantly improved quality of life at 9 months and greater satisfaction with care.
- ICM maintained continuous contact with all patients, whereas 6 control patients refused services by 18 months.
Conclusions:
- Intensive clinical case management (ICM) did not yield improvements in the clinical outcomes of 'hard to treat' SMI patients.
- ICM proved effective in maintaining patient contact with services and enhancing perceived quality of life and satisfaction.