Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: August 4, 2022
1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway College, University of London, Egham, UK. a.t.smith@rhbnc.ac.uk
Abstract:
There is considerable evidence that second-order motion, such as motion consisting of a drifting contrast modulation, is detected separately from first-order motion. Some previous studies have shown that the rate at which sensitivity declines as either drift speed or eccentricity increases is the same for both types of motion. However, these studies have used second-order motion stimuli based on static noise carriers, which we have shown (Smith & Ledgeway, 1997) may be inappropriate because they can give rise to local first-order artifacts. By using dynamic noise carriers, we isolate the second-order motion mechanism and show that its temporal response is much worse than that of the first-order system but that its rate of sensitivity loss with increasing stimulus eccentricity is indeed similar to that of the first-order motion system.
Related Concept Videos
Second Law: Motion under Same Force
Let's imagine a person is standing on a weighing...
Second Law: Motion under Same Acceleration
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the time...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration
Time differentiation is...
Second Order systems II
If ζ...

