Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity

A T Smith1, T Ledgeway

  • 1Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway College, University of London, Egham, UK. a.t.smith@rhbnc.ac.uk

Vision Research
|April 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Second-order motion perception is distinct from first-order motion. While its temporal processing is slower, sensitivity loss with increasing visual field eccentricity is similar for both motion types.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Malignant transformation in a cohort of patients with oral epithelial dysplasia.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Three changes to reduce the loss of dual degree trainees from OMFS national specialty selection in the UK: evidence based proposals.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

Connectivity of the Cingulate Sulcus Visual Area (CSv) in Macaque Monkeys.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2020
Same author

Hyperexcitability of brain stem pathways in cerebral palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2018
Same author

Measuring health-related benefit and quality of care in oral and maxillofacial surgery: British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Outcomes Project.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2018
Same author

Errors in interpretation of neck levels in postoperative pathological specimens.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2016

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion detection
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • First-order motion relies on luminance changes, while second-order motion uses features like contrast or texture.
  • Previous research suggested similar sensitivity decline rates for both motion types with increasing drift speed or eccentricity.
  • Static noise carriers in prior studies may have introduced confounding first-order artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate and characterize the second-order motion system.
  • To compare the temporal response and eccentricity-based sensitivity loss of second-order motion with first-order motion.
  • To address limitations of previous studies using static noise carriers.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized dynamic noise carriers to create pure second-order motion stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured the temporal response characteristics of the second-order motion system.
  • Assessed the decline in motion sensitivity as a function of stimulus eccentricity.

    • Main Results:

    • The second-order motion system exhibits significantly poorer temporal response compared to the first-order system.
    • Sensitivity loss in the second-order system with increasing eccentricity mirrors that of the first-order system.
    • Dynamic noise carriers effectively isolated second-order motion processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Second-order motion is processed through a distinct mechanism with unique temporal limitations.
    • Despite temporal differences, spatial scaling (eccentricity effects) appears consistent across first- and second-order motion systems.
    • Dynamic noise carriers provide a more accurate method for studying second-order motion mechanisms.