Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?

K L Mossman1

  • 1Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-2701, USA.

Medical Physics
|April 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary

The linear no-threshold (LNT) theory for radiation exposure is being challenged. Evidence suggests low-level radiation may be less harmful than LNT predicts, prompting debate on regulatory standards and economic impacts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide lentiviral shRNA screen identifies serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2 as a determinant of oncolytic virus activity in breast cancer cells.

Oncogene·2015
Same author

Oncolytic bovine herpesvirus type 1 infects and kills breast tumor cells and breast cancer-initiating cells irrespective of tumor subtype.

Cancer gene therapy·2013
Same author

Adenovirus evasion of interferon-mediated innate immunity by direct antagonism of a cellular histone posttranslational modification.

Cell host & microbe·2012
Same author

PML has a predictive role in tumor cell permissiveness to interferon-sensitive oncolytic viruses.

Gene therapy·2009
Same author

Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.

Radiation research·2008
Same author

Do radiation doses below 1 cGy increase cancer risks?

Radiation research·2005

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Biology
  • Public Health Policy
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • The linear no-threshold (LNT) theory is a foundational model for radiation protection standards.
  • Recent epidemiological studies challenge the LNT model's applicability at low radiation doses.
  • Debate exists between proponents of conservative risk assessment and opponents citing economic burdens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the scientific basis of the linear no-threshold (LNT) theory for radiation risk assessment.
  • To examine the implications of challenging the LNT model for regulatory standards and public health policy.
  • To explore alternative approaches for setting radiation exposure limits.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of epidemiological studies, including Japanese atomic bomb survivors and radiation-exposed workers.
  • Review of scientific literature and regulatory frameworks concerning low-level radiation exposure.
  • Discussion of the limitations of predictive models for low-dose radiation risk.

Main Results:

  • Epidemiological data suggest that low-level radiation may pose less risk than predicted by the LNT model.
  • The LNT model is considered simplistic and provides a conservative risk estimate.
  • Alternative models for low-dose risk prediction are also difficult to justify.

Conclusions:

  • The LNT theory's conservative approach to low-level radiation risk is increasingly questioned.
  • Abandoning LNT could have significant economic implications, but current models have limitations.
  • Prudent radiation protection may benefit from model-independent approaches based on direct health effect observations.

Related Experiment Videos