Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating divergence dates from molecular sequences

A Rambaut1, L Bromham

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. andrew.rambaut@zoo.ox.ac.uk

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic epidemiology of early SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in Bangladesh.

Virology journal·2024
Same author

Phylogenetic estimates of diversification rate are affected by molecular rate variation.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2017
Same author

Establishment and cryptic transmission of Zika virus in Brazil and the Americas.

Nature·2017
Same author

Using genomics data to reconstruct transmission trees during disease outbreaks.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2016
Same author

Is specialization an evolutionary dead end? Testing for differences in speciation, extinction and trait transition rates across diverse phylogenies of specialists and generalists.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2016
Same author

Salt tolerance evolves more frequently in C4 grass lineages.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new maximum-likelihood method for molecular dating, improving evolutionary divergence time estimates by accounting for rate variation. The approach offers robust divergence time estimates with confidence intervals for evolutionary biology research.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Molecular Evolution
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Molecular dating is crucial for evolutionary biology but struggles with rate variation.
  • Previous methods often fail to adequately address molecular evolutionary rate heterogeneity.
  • Accurate divergence time estimation is essential for understanding evolutionary history.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel maximum-likelihood approach for estimating divergence times.
  • To explicitly address and account for rate variation in molecular evolution.
  • To provide a more robust and reliable molecular dating technique.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a maximum-likelihood method incorporating rate variation.
  • Implemented a rate constancy test to exclude heterogeneous data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized confidence intervals for divergence time estimates.
  • Incorporated diverse sequences and fossil data for calibration.

    • Main Results:

    • The new method demonstrates robustness to certain modes of rate variation.
    • Rate constancy tests effectively identify and exclude problematic data.
    • Confidence intervals facilitate hypothesis testing for divergence times.
    • Accuracy is validated through simulations and sensitivity analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented maximum-likelihood method significantly improves molecular dating accuracy.
    • This approach offers solutions to key challenges in estimating divergence times.
    • The method provides a foundation for future advancements in molecular dating analyses.