Related Experiment Videos
Hypnotic interviewing: the best way to interview eyewitnesses?
1Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, U.K.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
|April 29, 1998
Summary
Hypnosis may improve eyewitness recall but often decreases accuracy and increases suggestibility. The cognitive interview is recommended for forensic investigations due to its effectiveness and lack of memory distortion issues.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
- Eyewitness Memory Research
Background:
- Hypnosis is proposed to enhance eyewitness memory in forensic settings.
- Laboratory studies indicate hypnosis can increase recall but also decrease accuracy and heighten suggestibility.
- These memory distortions limit hypnosis's utility in interviews.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of hypnosis versus alternative methods for enhancing eyewitness memory.
- To compare the potential for memory distortion between hypnosis and the cognitive interview.
- To determine the optimal interviewing procedure for forensic investigations.
Main Methods:
- Review of laboratory research on hypnosis and eyewitness memory.
- Analysis of factors contributing to memory enhancement in practical investigations involving hypnosis.
- Comparison of hypnosis with the cognitive interview procedure.
Main Results:
- Hypnosis techniques often lead to reduced accuracy and increased susceptibility to misinformation.
- Factors beyond hypnotic induction, such as interviewer skill, may contribute to perceived memory enhancement.
- The cognitive interview demonstrates potential for significant recall enhancement (approx. 35%) without memory distortion.
Conclusions:
- Hypnosis presents significant risks of memory distortion and reduced accuracy for eyewitness accounts.
- The cognitive interview offers a more reliable method for enhancing eyewitness recall in forensic investigations.
- The cognitive interview should be prioritized over hypnosis for practical investigative purposes.