Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
Published on: August 24, 2012
Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: a memory approach
1Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Donald_Blough@brown.edu
Increasing reinforcement frequency improved visual discrimination in pigeons. However, reinforcing sample pecks or noncontingent reinforcement decreased stimulus control and sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Cognitive psychology
- Behavioral neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding how reinforcement schedules impact learning is crucial in behavioral science.
- Context reinforcement, where reinforcement is tied to specific environmental cues, plays a role in modulating behavior.
- Previous research has explored various factors influencing discriminative learning in animals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying reinforcement densities on visual discrimination in pigeons.
- To examine how reinforcement of sample stimulus pecks and noncontingent reinforcement affect discriminative sensitivity and stimulus control.
- To compare the effectiveness of different reinforcement conditions on learning and accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Five pigeons were trained on a visual discrimination task involving different light wavelengths.
- Psychometric functions were used to quantify discriminative sensitivity (d') and stimulus control.
- Experimental conditions included varying percentages of reinforcement for correct choices (5% vs. 20%), reinforcement of sample stimulus pecks, and noncontingent reinforcement during intertrial intervals.
Main Results:
- Higher reinforcement density (20%) led to significantly better discriminative sensitivity and stimulus control compared to lower density (5%).
- Reinforcement of sample stimulus pecks substantially reduced stimulus control and slightly decreased sensitivity.
- Noncontingent reinforcement, whether signaled or not, also reduced stimulus control.
Conclusions:
- Reinforcement density is a critical factor in visual discrimination learning.
- Contingent reinforcement schedules are more effective than noncontingent or sample-based reinforcement for maintaining high levels of discriminative performance.
- The findings support memory-based models of discrimination, suggesting that reinforcement history influences current stimulus control.
More Related Videos
12:12Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Repressed Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...