Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What is 'heavy'?

A M Genaidy1, W Karwowski, D M Christensen

  • 1Mechanical, Industrial and Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0116, USA.

Ergonomics
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin.

Resuscitation·2019
Same author

Case Report: Industrial X-Ray Injury Treated With Non-Cultured Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF).

Health physics·2016
Same author

The effect of mutations near the T1 copper site on the biochemical characteristics of the small laccase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).

Enzyme and microbial technology·2014
Same author

The Internet's role in a biodosimetric response to a radiation mass casualty event.

Health physics·2014
Same author

Isokinetic pull-up strength profiles of men and women in different working posture.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

Changes in lightness of porcine lean meat batters during processing.

Meat science·2011
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Workers perceive load heaviness differently. This study defines

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Ergonomics
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Workplace safety protocols often rely on subjective load heaviness perception.
  • Limited ergonomic data exists defining perceived 'heavy load' thresholds.
  • Accurate load perception is crucial for preventing musculoskeletal injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify load weights corresponding to subjective heaviness categories.
  • To establish perceptual norms for manual load handling in the package delivery industry.
  • To compare findings with existing occupational safety guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized fuzzy set theory to model load distributions across heaviness levels.
  • Recruited 40 experienced package delivery workers (20 male, 20 female).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed perceived load heaviness for various weight increments.

    • Main Results:

    • The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 23 kg maximum load aligns with a 'somewhat heavy' perception (1.0 certainty).
    • A 40 kg load, referenced in older NIOSH guidelines, may be perceived as 'very heavy'.
    • A 'moderate' load of 14 kg is manageable by 85% of the studied workforce.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing statistical norms for load handling perception require cautious interpretation.
    • Findings provide a more nuanced understanding of subjective load heaviness.
    • Recommendations for revised manual handling guidelines based on perceptual data are suggested.