Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Macrolide antibiotics
1Pharmacology Section, University of Southern California School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, USA.
Abstract:
The macrolides remain excellent antibiotics for many infections particularly those involving intracellular and/or respiratory pathogens. Erythromycin is still an effective drug for many acute orofacial infections. The newer macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, should also prove efficacious although there is very little current data on their use in orofacial infections. They have the advantages over erythromycin of less GI toxicity, higher tissue concentrations, greater gram-negative spectrum, and once or twice daily dosing for better patient compliance. Macrolide concentration in inflammatory cells and transport to the site of infection is a distinct advantage over other antibiotics. Both erythromycin and clarithromycin are associated with significant drug interactions but azithromycin is devoid of such potential toxicity. Azithromycin is less effective against gram-negative cocci than erythromycin and clarithromycin and attains very high tissue concentrations for a very long time, but whether either of these characteristics is clinically significant for orofacial infections is presently unknown.
Insights
Macrolide antibiotics, including erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, are effective for orofacial infections. Newer macrolides offer improved safety and dosing compared to erythromycin.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
- Oral Medicine
Background:
- Macrolides are crucial antibiotics for intracellular and respiratory pathogens.
- Erythromycin is a current standard for acute orofacial infections.
- Limited data exists on newer macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin) for orofacial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy and characteristics of macrolide antibiotics for orofacial infections.
- To compare newer macrolides with erythromycin in terms of toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and spectrum.
- To assess the potential clinical significance of azithromycin's properties in orofacial infections.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of macrolide antibiotics.
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.
- Comparison of clinical data and drug interaction profiles.
Main Results:
- Newer macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin) offer advantages over erythromycin: reduced GI toxicity, higher tissue concentrations, broader Gram-negative spectrum, and improved dosing compliance.
- Macrolides concentrate in inflammatory cells, enhancing delivery to infection sites.
- Azithromycin lacks significant drug interactions, unlike erythromycin and clarithromycin.
- Azithromycin's reduced efficacy against Gram-negative cocci and prolonged tissue retention require further clinical investigation for orofacial infections.
Conclusions:
- Azithromycin and clarithromycin show promise for orofacial infections, with potential benefits in tolerability and patient compliance.
- While azithromycin's pharmacokinetic profile is advantageous, its clinical impact on Gram-negative cocci in orofacial infections remains to be determined.
- Further research is needed to fully establish the role of newer macrolides in managing orofacial infections.
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Proteins
Interferons
Interferons (IFNs) are proteins produced by lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts infected with viruses. While IFNs cannot prevent viruses from entering and...
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

