[Coronary angiography in two defined populations: Padua and Citadella]

Coronary angiography is an invasive procedure that is relatively expensive and that requires an appropriate indication.

Utilization rate and the appropriateness of the use of the coronary angiography have been compared in two defined populations, namely residents from the city of Padua (group A), and subjects from the local health unit of Cittadella (group B), who underwent coronary angiography between June 1, 1992 and May 31, 1993. Appropriateness was evaluated both by comparison with the AHA/ACC guidelines and by observation of the outcome following diagnosis one year after the coronary angiogram was performed.

One hundred and seventy-one patients in group A and 100 patients in group B underwent coronary angiography: both groups had similar age and sex distribution. Utilization rate was 8 per 10,000 inhabitants in group A, and 10 per 10,000 inhabitants in group B. Appropriate coronary angiography, evaluated by comparison with the AHA/ACC guidelines, was 69.9% in group A and 68% in group B. Coronary angiogram showed at least one stenosis > or = 50% in 133 patients from group A and in 66 patients from group B. These patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Of 13 deaths, 12 occurred as fatal cardiac events, while of the 147 surviving patients who had complete follow-up data, 114 (77%) improved. The outcome was measured through symptoms and stress test. In addition, subjective improvement was measured in group A using the "Nottingham Health Profile".

Criteria of appropriateness for an invasive diagnostic procedure such as coronary angiography, which is a determinant "entry point" for revascularization procedures, is based on common clinical knowledge that may be evolving with time. Based on these data, it seems that the current guidelines could be modified, especially for indications within the setting of myocardial infarction.